Vladimir Utkin’s Free-Energy Secrets

نوشته شده در موضوع تولید انرژی رایگان در 31 مه 2017


FREE-ENERGY:
NIKOLA TESLA SECRETS FOR EVERYBODY

by Vladimir Utkin     u.v@bk.ru

FIRST SECRET

All of Tesla’s secrets are shaped on

ELECTROMAGNETIC FEEDBACK

EXPLANATION: An typical appetite complement comprises a generator and engine (common view), and can be finished with an electric stream feedback as shown here in electrical circuit (a)

In box (a), a complement once started, will delayed down and stop since of friction, insurgency and so on. Nikola Tesla organised a feedback loop for a electromagnetic field: box (b), and he said:

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD FEEDBACK DESTROYS THE INTERACTION SYMMETRY

This means that an movement no longer has an equal and conflicting greeting

In box (b), once started, a complement will accelerate in annoy of friction, insurgency and so on (provided that a proviso of a electromagnetic feedback is certain and is amply large). In sequence for an electromagnetic margin to exist in a motor, there contingency be some appetite input, and Tesla said:

ENERGY GENERATION BY IT’S OWN APPLICATION

QUESTION: How can we furnish certain electromagnetic margin feedback?

AN ANSWER: The simplest and obvious instance is Michael Faraday’s unipolar motor, as mutated by Nikola Tesla:

An typical unipolar engine consists of a magnetised disk, and a voltage unsentimental between a pivot and a indicate on a rim of a front as shown in (a) above. But an typical unipolar engine can also consists of an outmost magnet and a steel front with a voltage unsentimental between a pivot and a marginal indicate on a front as in (b) above. Tesla motionless to cgange this chronicle of a unipolar motor. He cut a steel front into scrolled sections as shown here:

In this case, a expenditure of stream produces an additional captivating margin along a pivot of a disc. When a current-carrying wires are slanted in one direction, their captivating margin augments a categorical outmost captivating field. When a wires are slanted in a other direction, their captivating margin reduces a categorical outmost captivating field. So, a stream upsurge can boost or revoke a outmost captivating margin of a unipolar motor.


Amplification is not probable though requesting appetite

If it is probable to arrange a captivating margin feedback loop for automatic devices, afterwards it is substantially probable to arrange it for solid-state inclination like coils and capacitors.
The others tools of this essay are clinging to inclination that use coils and capacitors. All of a examples in this essay are usually dictated to assistance your bargain of a beliefs involved. Understanding would be finished easier if we recompense courtesy to a ferromagnetic helmet of a second curl in a transformer invented by Nikola Tesla:

In this case, a ferromagnetic defense separates a initial and second coils in a transformer from any other, and that defense can be used as captivating margin feedback loop. This fact will be useful for bargain a final partial of this article. It is also useful to cruise a properties of a electrostatic field.

ELECTROSTATICS

(scalar margin and a longitudinal electromagnetic waves)

Comment: Mr. Tesla said, “there is eager energy, perpendicular to a aspect of any charged conductor, assembled by a scalar electromagnetic field, so giving arise to longitudinal electromagnetic waves”.

At initial glance, this contradicts a age-old knowledge in study a electromagnetic margin (according to complicated concepts, any electromagnetic margin has components that are perpendicular to a instruction of a propagated electromagnetic wave), also, Maxwell’s equations report an electromagnetic margin as a vector. However, a initial sense is erroneous, and no counterbalance exists.

Definitions of Physics: Any conductor has both inductance and capacitance, that is, a ability to amass assign on it’s surface. A assign on a aspect of a conductor creates an electric margin (electrostatic field). The appetite (voltage) during any indicate of a electric margin is a scalar quantity!!! (That is, it is a scalar electric margin …).

If a electric assign of a conductor varies with time, afterwards a electrostatic margin will also change with time, ensuing in a entrance of a captivating margin component:

Thus, a electromagnetic call is shaped (with a longitudinal member of E …).

REMARK: In sequence to know how a longitudinal call interacts with conductive bodies, one needs to review a territory of electrostatics entitled “Electrification by Influence”. Particularly engaging are Maxwell’s equations where they discuss a banishment current.

Now we come to a initial secret:


SECRET 1

The appetite source in Nikola Tesla’s giveaway appetite device, a amplifying transformer, is a

SELF-POWERED L-C CIRCUIT

EXPLANATIONS:

AN EXAMPLE OF UNLIMITED VOLTAGE RISE
(Based on batteries and a switch)

EXPLANATION:   Batteries 1 and 2 are connected to a capacitor C alternately, by a inductances L. Voltage on capacitor C and a voltage from a batteries are increasing. As a result, there can be sum voltage rise. When a voltage on a capacitor reaches a preferred level, it is connected to a load.

COMMENT:   Two diodes were used to equivocate synchronisation requirements. Manual or send switching can be used. One doing used a hint opening to bond a outlay bucket though a switch is an choice method.

TIMELINE FOR THE PROCESS:

The schematics can be simplified, and usually one battery used (load is connected in a same way).

COMMENT:   Maybe Alfred Hubbard used an thought shown as choice B, in some versions of his transformer

COMMENT:   If we wish to get a self-powered circuit, we have to arrange some kind of appetite feedback to a batteries. But, is this an tangible FE technology? we am not sure….

QUESTION: Is this a usually approach to do it?   No, of march not – there are conflicting ways of doing it. For example, we can use fields inside and outward of some LC circuits. How can we do that?

For some-more secrets review a following parts…


HOW DO WE GET THIS RESULT?

AN ANSWER:

You need to assign a capacitor regulating a electric member of a electromagnetic margin of a inductor (using a banishment stream of Maxwell’s equations)

EXPLANATION
When a electric margin in capacitor C is decaying, due to feeding electrical stream into an inductor (not shown), a outmost electric margin generated by a inductor tries to assign this capacitor with a inductor’s banishment current. As a result, a capacitor draws appetite in from a surrounding electromagnetic field, and a capacitor’s voltage rises cycle by cycle.

IMPLEMENTATION A – a executive capacitor is used:

IMPLEMENTATION B – no capacitors are used:

In this box instead of regulating a capacitor, a capacitance between a dual sections of inductor L provides a compulsory capacitance.

HOW DO WE START THE PROCESS?
In doing A, we contingency assign a capacitor and bond it to a inductor to start a process.
In doing B, we contingency use an additional pulsing or “kicking” coil, that starts a routine by providing a beat in presumably a electrical margin or a captivating margin (shown after on).

HOW DO WE STOP THE PROCESS?
The routine of pumping appetite can continue undeviating for an sum length of time and so a doubt arises; how do we stop a device if we should wish to?. This can be finished by joining a hint opening conflicting a curl L and a ensuing sparking will be sufficient to stop a process.

THE “KICKING” PROCESS WITH AN ELECTRIC FIELD
Use an additional special “kicking” coil, that can beget brief absolute captivating pulses, and implement an amplifying Tesla curl along a electrical matrix of a electromagnetic margin of this coil.

The electrical margin of a pushing beat or “kicking” curl will assign a widespread capacitors of a inductor, and a routine will be started. Use pulses as brief as probable in “kicking” coil, since a banishment stream depends on a speed of a changes in a captivating field.

THE “KICKING” PROCESS WITH A MAGNETIC FIELD
It is not probable to “kick” a routine by banishment of a amplifying Tesla curl in a uniform changing captivating margin of a “kicking” coil, since a outlay voltage on a ends of a Tesla amplifying curl will be equal to 0 in this case. So, we contingency use a non-uniform captivating field. For that we contingency implement a “kicking” coil, not in a centre of a amplifying Tesla coil, though positioned divided from a centre

IS THAT ALL TRUE, AND THE BEST TECHNIQUE TO USE?
No, it is not! Nikola Tesla found some-more forked and some-more absolute routine – his bi-filar pancake coil!

BI-FILAR PANCAKE COIL – MAY BE THE BEST METHOD
The voltage between adjacent turns in an typical curl is really low, and so their ability to beget additional appetite is not good. Consequently, we need to lift a voltage between adjacent turns in an inductor.

Method: sequence a inductor into apart parts, and position a turns of a initial partial in between a turns of a second part, and afterwards bond finish of a initial curl to a commencement of a second coil. When we do that, a voltage between adjacent turns will be a same as a voltage between a ends of a whole curl !!!

Next step – file a position of a captivating and electric fields in a approach indispensable for requesting amplifying appetite (as described above). The routine for doing this is – a prosaic pancake curl where a captivating and electric fields are organised in accurately a approach indispensable for amplifying energy.

Now, it is transparent since Tesla always pronounced that his bi-filar pancake curl was an energy-amplifying curl !!!

REMARK: for a best charging of a healthy self-capacitance of a coil, we have to use electric pulses that are as brief as possible, since a banishment stream as shown in Maxwell’s equation, depends to a critical grade on a speed of a change in a captivating field.

THE DUAL-LAYER CYLINDRICAL BI-FILAR COIL

Instead of a customary corresponding cylindrical bi-filar coil, a curl circuitous might also be organised in dual apart layers, one on tip of a other:

THE ELECTRO – RADIANT EFFECT
(Inductance in an electrostatic field)


EXPLANATION

The primary curl in Tesla’s transformer is a initial image of a capacitor. The delegate curl – is a second image of a capacitor. When we assign a capacitor C from your source of energy, we assign a handle of a primary curl also. As a result, a handle of a delegate curl is charging also (as a lapse from ambient space).

In sequence to start a process, we have to remove
charge from a primary curl (by arranging a burst in appetite in ambient space). When this is done, a outrageous banishment stream occurs – as a outcome of that appetite jump. Inductance catches this
magnetic flux, and we have appetite amplification.

If this routine is operating, afterwards we beget a captivating margin in ambient space.

COMMENT:   The capacitance of a handle of a primary curl is really low, and so it takes really little appetite to assign it, and a really brief hint to liberate it (without stealing assign from a capacitor C).

COMMENT:   Notice that a hint opening must be connected to
the belligerent as, in my opinion, this is a really critical underline of this process, but Mr Tesla did not uncover grounding. Perhaps this needs to be a apart education point.

REMARK:   In my opinion, this record was also used in Gray’s device and in Smith’s inclination and in both cases the hint opening was connected to a ground.

ALSO:  
Pay courtesy to a disproportion used in Gray’s obvious “…. for preliminary load”.

And, recompense courtesy to Smith’s disproportion “I can see this captivating field, if we use a magnetometer”.

MODERN IMPLEMENTATIONS

in self-powered L-C circuits

EXAMPLE 1
Using a bi-filar curl as a primary curl in a low-pitched Tesla transformer


By Don Smith

Explanation:   The bi-filar primary curl is used as primary for appetite amplification, and is pulsed by a hint gap.

EXAMPLE 2
By Mislavskij
Is comprised of dual capacitor plates sandwiching a ferrite ring core with a curl wound on it:

EXPLANATION
When a capacitor is charging (or discharging), this “displacement” stream upsurge generates a captivating margin in a opening in a round form (Maxwell’s equations). If a curl is wound on a ferrite toroid placed between a plates of a capacitor, afterwards a voltage is generated in a turns of that coil:

Also, if an swapping stream is unsentimental to a curl wound on a ferrite toroid, afterwards voltage is generated on a capacitor plates.

If an inductor and a capacitor are sum in an L-C circuit, afterwards there are dual cases inside such an L-C circuit:

a) appetite loudness           and           b) appetite drop


The conditions depends on how a coils and capacitor are connected together

COMMENT: If a instruction of a turns in a curl wound on a ferrite core is reversed, afterwards a wires joining a curl to a capacitor plates need to be substituted over as well.

The initial experiments with a ferrite core inside a capacitor were finished in 1992 by Mislavskij (a 7th-year student of a Moscow school), and so it is famous as “Mislavskij’s transformer”

THE SAME APPROACH?

By Don Smith

In this arrangement, a capacitor is charged by sparks and absolute banishment stream is produced. The transformer with a ferromagnetic core is collecting this current.

COMMENT: This schematic blueprint is really rough, and lacking in details. It will not perform rightly though back-electromagnetic force termination of some kind (see below).

SECRET 1.1

Back-EMF termination in a resonating Tesla coil

Version 1

The primary and delegate coils, and a belligerent tie in this Tesla curl are organised in special manner:

Explanation:   The sparkling (driving) stream and a bucket stream in an electromagnetic field, are perpendicular to any other as shown here:

COMMENT:   In sequence to get an appetite gain, a magnitude of excitation of a primary curl contingency be a low-pitched magnitude of a delegate coil.

COMMENT:   Excitation with usually a singular hint is possible.

COMMENT:   In Mr. Tesla’s terminology, this is pumping charges or assign funneling, a assign is entrance from a belligerent (which is a source of energy).

POTENTIAL (VOLTAGE) DISTRIBUTION ON THE COIL

EXPLANATION: The assign of a oscillating circuit is to emanate a inner electromagnetic margin with a vast electrical component. In theory, it would usually be compulsory to assign adult a high voltage capacitor usually once and afterwards a lossless circuit would contend a oscillations indefinitely though wanting any serve appetite input. In reality, there are some waste and so some additional appetite submit is needed.

THESE OSCILLATIONS ACT AS A “BAIT”, ATTRACTING CHARGE INFLOW FROM THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENT. Almost no appetite is indispensable in sequence to emanate and contend such a “bait”…

The subsequent step is to pierce to this “bait” to one side of a circuit, tighten to a source of a charges that is a Ground. At this little separation, relapse occurs and a fundamental parasitic capacitance of a circuit will be now recharged with appetite issuing into a circuit from outside.

At a ends of a circuit there will be a voltage difference, and so there will be forged oscillations. The instruction of this electromagnetic margin is perpendicular to a strange margin of a “bait” and so it does not destroy it. This outcome is due to a fact that a curl consists of dual hostile halves. The parasitic oscillations gradually die out, and they do not destroy a “bait” field.

The routine is steady hint by hint for any hint that occurs. Consequently, a some-more mostly sparks occur, a larger a potency of a routine will be. The appetite in a “bait” practice roughly no dissipation, providing a many larger appetite outlay than a appetite indispensable to keep a device operating.


TESLA SCHEMATICS

COMMENT:   Don Smith named this record “Bird on a wire”. The bird is protected on a handle until a hint occurs.

COMMENT:   Mr. Tesla named this record a “charge funnel” or “charge pump”

THE PRINCIPLE OF THE TECHNOLOGY
1. This Free-Energy device generates an AC electrical appetite in ambient space (“bait” for electrons),
2. Electrons issuing by a load, upsurge in from a environment, captivated by this “bait” (pumped in)

NOT A SINGLE ELECTRON USED FOR EXCITING AMBIENT SPACE NEEDS TO FLOW THROUGH THE LOAD

POSSIBLE DESIGN FOR THE “CHARGE PUMP” or “CHARGE FUNNEL”

By Edwin Gray
Probable Schematic for Edwin Gray’s Cold Electricity Circuit

EXPLANATION:   This schematic is a simplification of Gray’s patent, assembled by Dr. Peter Lindemann for larger construction in his book

A POSSIBLE DESIGN FOR THE “CHARGE PUMP” or “CHARGE FUNNEL”

EXPLANATION: The charging complement is incompetent to “see” a margin inside a charging capacitor.

COMMON VIEW OF RESONANCE: Resonance is not broken if we short-circuit or open a “pumping” capacitor.

COMMENT: You can supplement an ordinary, really vast capacitor in together with a “pumping” capacitor for some-more considerable results.

Don Smith illustration

COMMENTS: You have to use an swapping E-field, in sequence to assign a capacitor. But, Smith remarkable a North and South poles in his drawing. we cruise that this is loyal for usually one instant. Diodes are not shown in his drawings, that indicates that his device as shown, is, to my mind, not complete.

THE EXTERNAL APPEARANCE OF ED GRAY’S TUBE

EXPLANATION:   Gray’s tube with it’s dual inner grids is seen in a middle. Two diodes are underneath a acrylic block (???). A Leiden Jar is located on a left (???) The HF HV curl is behind Gray’s tube (???)

A POSSIBLE DESIGN FOR THE “CHARGE PUMP” or “CHARGE FUNNEL”
THE TESTATIKA by Paul Bauman
EXPLANATION: The executive electrode in a jars (capacitors) is for a excitation of ambient space; a dual outmost cylinders are a plates of a charging capacitors.

EXPLANATION: The charging resource is incompetent to “see” a margin inside a charging capacitors.
COMMENT: For some-more sum review a territory on asymmetrical capacitors.

A POSSIBLE DESIGN FOR THE “CHARGE PUMP” or “CHARGE FUNNEL”

COMMENT:   This is shaped on Tesla’s schematics

COMMENT:   First, we need to arrange a “voltage killer” separator on one side of a Tesla coil. This is to emanate a “BLIND” charging complement that can’t “see” a assign on a capacitor (see subsequent for some-more fact on “blindness”).

COMMENTS:   Huge capacitor means: as many typical capacitance as possible.     Effectiveness depends on voltage and curl frequency, and stream in a node.     Effectiveness depends also on a magnitude during that a excitation hint occurs. It is really matching to Don Smith’s devices.

COMMENT:   For some-more sum review partial clinging to Avramenko’s plug…

POSSIBLE DESIGN FOR THE “CHARGE PUMP” or “CHARGE FUNNEL”

EXPLANATION:   The charging complement is incompetent to “see” a margin inside a charging capacitor

COMMENT:   For some-more sum review partial clinging to Avramenko’s plug…

COMMENT:   An typical block of handle can be used in some versions of this device, review below….

ENERGY REGENERATION BY
L/4 COIL

COMMENT:   This complement is shaped on wireless appetite delivery by a belligerent

COMMENT:   Energy radiated to ambient space lowers a potency of this process
COMMENT:   The Receiver and Transmitter coils contingency have a same low-pitched frequency

COMMENT:   Possible choice arrangement:

COMMENT:   A steel block can be used instead of a prolonged wire

The “COLD” and “HOT” ends of a Tesla Coil
by Donald Smith

COMMENT:   If a excitation curl L2 is positioned in a centre of curl L2, afterwards a Tesla Coil will have a “cold” finish and a “hot” end. A hint opening can usually be connected to a “hot” end. You can't get a good hint if a hint opening is connected to a “cold” end.

COMMENT:   This is really critical for unsentimental applications, so review Don Smith’s papers for some-more details.

COMMENT:   It is easy know a “Hot” and “Cold” ends, if one finish of Tesla Coil is grounded…

The Grounded Tesla curl – a dark form of energy
EXPLANATION:   We can demeanour during a Tesla curl as a block of metal. Every block of steel can be charged. If Tesla curl is grounded, it has an additional assign delivered from a ground, and has an additional appetite also. But, it can be find out usually in electrostatics interactions, not in electromagnetic one.

Comment:   This blueprint shows usually one instant, after half a cycle, a polarities will be substituted over.

Question:   How can we use this fact?

Answer:   We have to arrange an electrostatic interaction:

Comments:
Extra capacitors can be used for charging them.

This looks like Smith’s plasma creation device. Maybe, he used this technology.

This can be used in assign siphon record for excitation by an swapping electrical field, review a territory on a assign siphon or assign funnel.

The wiring can be conflicting to that shown above.

Examples of grounded bifilar (multi-strand) coils
From Tariel Kapanadze in his 100 KW device

from Steven Mark in vast TPU

from Donald Smith

Both of a dual out of proviso outputs were used and both connected to a step-down transformer.

1. Between sparks:
There is no stream in a step-down transformer and so a dual ends of L2 are during a same voltage.

2. During a spark:
Parasitic capacitors (not shown) of L2 (it’s adult and down parts) are liberated to a ground, and stream is assembled in a step-down transformer. One finish of L2 is during belligerent potential. But, a captivating margin of this stream in L2 is perpendicular to a resonating margin and so has no change on it. As a outcome of this, we have appetite in a load, though a inflection is not destroyed.

COMMENTS:   In my opinion, these schematics have errors in a excitation section. Find those errors.

Excitation by a singular hint is possible.

In a vernacular of Mr. Tesla, this is a ‘charge pump’ or ‘charge funnel’.

The charges are entrance from a Ground that is a source of a energy.

There are some-more secrets in a following parts.

SECRET 1.1
Back EMF termination in a inflection coil
Version 2

Primary and delegate coils are placed on a rod core. All of a coils are organised in special manner. The primary curl is placed in a core of a core. The delegate curl is in dual tools that are positioned during a ends of a rod. All of a coils are wound in a same direction.

Explanation:

The electromagnetic fields assembled by a low-pitched (excitation) stream and a bucket stream are perpendicular to any other:

So, nonetheless we have appetite in a load, inflection is not broken by that outlay power.

COMMENTS:   The bucket contingency be selected so as to get a limit volume of appetite issuing into it. Very low loads and really high loads will both have tighten to 0 appetite issuing in them.

The delegate curl is shunting a primary coil, and so it has a stream issuing in it even id no loads are connected.

The delegate curl can be practiced for inflection too.

The “rod” element can be air, or other materials.

SECRET 1.1
Back EMF termination in a inflection coil
Version 3
(long line use – bifilar usage)

EXPLANATION:   It is really many like Version 1, though here, a dual coils are sum into a singular coil.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE!
(Without behind EMF suppression)
By Don Smith

Multi-coil complement for appetite computation

COMMENT:   You endorse how we cruise it was made.   Maybe short-circuited coils will be useful…

Read a following tools to learn some-more secrets…

IMODERN OPTIONS?
For Back EMF suppression
Version 3

BI-FILAR USAGE
By Tariel Kapanadze

BI-FILAR USAGE
By Timothy Trapp

COMMENT:   See Trapp’s sites for some-more details

POSSIBLE CORE CONFIGURATION
For behind EMF suppression

COMMENTS:   An typical excitation circuitous is wound all of a approach around a toroidal core. A bi-filar outlay circuitous is wound around a whole of a toroidal core. Remember about a “Hot” and “Cold” ends of a bi-filar coil.

COMMENT:   Remember about a “Hot” and “Cold” ends of a outlay coil

THE BASIS OF BACK EMF SUPPRESSION

(Tesla patent)

SECRET 1.2
The Spark-Exciting Generator (“SEG”)

(Charge delivering to LC circuit)

EXPLANATION:

The hint delivers assign to a L-C circuit

The assign Q on a capacitor C with voltage U is: Q = U x C or U = Q / C

        Where Q is a assign delivered by one spark.

During a excitation of a L-C circuit by a sparks, a capacitance C is constant.
After N excitations, a voltage Un on C will be Un = N x Q / C And, appetite En will be lifted as N2.
In other words, If a L-C circuit is vehement by charges, we have appetite amplification.

COMMENT: You need to know that a feedback loop in a electromagnetic margin is a changing voltage spin in a L-C circuit capacitor, a high-voltage transformer is connected to collect a additional energy.

WITHOUT SYNCHRONISATION

The Spark-Exciting Generator
From Don Smith

MAINTAIN RESONANCE AND GET FREE-ENERGY !!

EXPLANATION:   It appears that we need to assign a capacitor circuit to an appetite spin that is larger than that of a source appetite itself. At initial glance, this appears to be an unfit task, though a problem is indeed solved utterly simply.

The charging complement is screened, or “blinded”, to use a vernacular of Mr. Tesla, so that it can't “see” a participation of a assign in a capacitor. To accomplish this, one finish of a capacitor is connected to a belligerent and a other finish is connected to a high-energy coil, a second finish of that is free. After joining to this aloft appetite spin from a energising coil, electrons from a belligerent can assign a capacitor to a really high level.

In this case, a charging complement does not “see” what assign is already in a capacitor. Each beat is treated as if it were a initial beat ever generated. Thus, a capacitor can strech a aloft appetite spin than of a source itself.

After a accumulation of a energy, it is liberated to a bucket by a liberate hint gap. After that, a routine is steady again and again indefinitely …

COMMENT:   The magnitude of a excitation sparks, contingency review a low-pitched magnitude of a outlay coil. (capacitors 2 and 14 are used to grasp this goal). This is multi-spark excitation.

COMMENT:   Charges are pumping from a belligerent to 11-15 circuit, this device extracts assign from ambient space. Because of this, it will not work scrupulously though a belligerent connection. If we need Mains frequency, or don’t wish use an outlay spark, afterwards review a following parts…

Asymmetrical transformers can be used (read a following parts)

POSSIBLE SEG ARRANGEMENT
(From Russian forum)

COMMENT:   The L1 Tesla curl shown above, is energised by hint f1. Resonant, step-down transformer L2 is connected to a L1 Tesla curl by outlay hint f2. The magnitude of f1 is many aloft than that of f2.

SEG WITHOUT SYNCHRONISATION
From Don Smith

REMARK: It contingency be practiced by dimensions, materials (???)


EXPLANATION

REMINDER: An typical capacitor is a device for separating charges on it’s plates, the sum assign inside an typical capacitor is 0 (read a textbooks).

There is an electrical margin usually inside a capacitor. The electrical margin outward a capacitor is 0 (because a fields cancel any other).

So far, joining one image to a belligerent we will get no stream issuing in this circuit:


REMINDER: A distant capacitor is a device for accumulating charges on it’s plates.   The sum assign on a distant capacitor is NOT zero
(read a textbooks). So far, by joining one image of a distant capacitor to a belligerent we will get a stream issuing in this circuit (because there is an outmost field).

REMARK: We get a same situation, if usually one image of an typical capacitor is charged. So far, joining an uncharged plate of an typical capacitor to a belligerent we get a stream issuing in this circuit also (because we have an outmost field).

Alternately charging a capacitor’s plates
Avramenko’s block – is it a giveaway appetite device?

The principle: Each image of a capacitor charges as a distant capacitor. Charging takes place in an swapping fashion, initial one image and afterwards a other plate.

The result: The capacitor is charged to a voltage that is larger than that that a charging complement delivers.

Explanation: The outmost margin of an typical charged capacitor is equal to or circuitously zero, as remarkable above. So, if we assign plates as a distant capacitor (upload or download charge), a charging complement will not “see” a margin that already exists inside a capacitor, and will assign a plates as if a margin inside a capacitor is absent.

Once a image has been charged, start to assign another plate.

After a second image of a capacitor has been charged, a outmost margin becomes 0 again. The charging complement can't “see” a margin inside a capacitor once again and a routine repeats again several times, lifting a voltage until a hint opening connected to a outlay bucket discharges it.

REMARK: You will remember that an typical capacitor is a device for assign separation. The charging routine of a capacitor causes electrons from on one image to be “pumped” to another plate. After that, there is an additional of electrons on one plate, while a other one has deficit, and that creates a appetite disproportion between them (read a textbooks). The sum volume of assign inside a capacitor does not change. Thus the assign of a charging complement is to pierce assign temporarily from one image to another.

The simplest Free-Energy device (???)

REMARK: The capacitance of an typical capacitor is many larger than a capacitance of a distant image capacitor (if it’s plates are tighten to any other).


COMMENT:
The time between S1 and S2 is really short.


REMARK:
This is an painting of energy-dependence in a concurrent system.


REMARK:
This is an painting of a supposed Zero-Point Energy.

ASYMMETRICAL CAPACITOR
(Current amplification???)

COMMENT: The capacitance (size) of a image on a right is many larger than that of a image on a left.

COMMENT: Charges from a belligerent will run on to a right palm image UNTIL a impulse when a outmost margin drops to 0 caused by a second hint (“S2”). It takes some-more charges issuing from a belligerent to destroy a outmost margin during a benefaction of a second spark, since a capacitance of a image on a right is distant greater. ‘More charge’ means ‘more current’, so we have achieved stream loudness by this arrangement.

COMMENT: The margin during a terminals of a image on a right is not 0 after both sparks have occurred, this is since a margin stays due to a additional charges that have flowed in (‘pumped’) from a ground.

THE SIMPLEST ASYMMETRICAL CAPACITORS
The many elementary asymmetrical capacitors are a Leyden jar and a coaxial handle (also invented by Mr. Tesla).

Apart from a fact that a area (capacitance) of a plates of these capacitors is different, and they therefore are asymmetrical, they have another property:
The electrostatic margin of a outmost electrode of these inclination does not impact a inner electrode.

EXPLANATION: This is caused by a fact that a electrostatic margin is absent inside a steel bodies (see textbooks).

REMARK: This is loyal supposing that a plates are charged separately.

CAPACITOR – TRIODE

REMARK: Dr. Harold Aspden has forked out a probability of Energy Amplification when regulating this device.

THE PRINCIPLE OF THE “BLINDNESS”
CHARGING SYSTEM IN THE SEG

EXPLANATION:   A “short” curl is not means to see oscillations in “long” coil, since a sum series of captivating lines from “long” curl by “short” curl is tighten to 0 (one half is in one instruction and one half is in conflicting direction).

COMMENT:   This a private box of asymmetrical transformer, for some-more sum review partial clinging to asymmetrical transformers.

COMMENTS ABOUT THE SEG:
All Back EMF schematics can be used in SEG

COMMENT:   No stream will be assembled in a bucket unless there is a belligerent tie in any of these circuits. Is excitation probable with usually a singular hint (???)

FOR MORE ASYMMETRY IN SEG ?
FOR ONE SPARK EXCITING IN SEG ?

By Don Smith

COMMENT:   This arrangement becomes some-more asymmetrical after excitation.

EXPLANATION
Symmetry is broken by a spark

If a impedances of Ra and Rc are a same during a magnitude assembled by vigilance generator F1, afterwards a ensuing voltage during points A and B will also be matching that means that there will be 0 output.

If a circuit is vehement by a really sharp, positive-only, DC voltage spike assembled by a spark, afterwards a impedances of Ra and Rc are not a same and there is a non-zero output.

Here is a probable alternative. Please note that a position of a outlay curl contingency be adjusted, it’s best position depending on value of resistor Rc and a magnitude being assembled by vigilance generator F1.

Here is another probable arrangement. Here, a position of a outlay curl depends on L1 and L2:

A NOMOGRAPH

Using a nomograph: Draw a loyal line from your selected 30 kHz magnitude (purple line) by your selected 100 nanofarad capacitor value and lift a line on as distant as a (blue) inductance line as shown above.

You can now review a reactance off a red line, that looks like 51 ohms to me. This means that when a circuit is regulating during a magnitude of 30 kHz, afterwards a stream upsurge by your 100 nF capacitor will be a same as by a 51 ohm resistor. Reading off a blue “Inductance” line that same stream upsurge during that magnitude would start with a curl that has an inductance of 0.28 millihenries.

MODERN OPTIONS IN SEG
Back EMF termination in inflection curl
Version 3
By Don Smith

COMMENT:   Please note that a prolonged handle is used and one-spark excitation, where additional capacitors are used to emanate non-symmetry (???)

Version???
By Don Smith


Multi curl complement for appetite computation

Version???

By Tariel Kapanadze

KAPANADZE PROCESS

The routine requires usually 4 steps:

STEP 1

An L-C (coil-capacitor) circuit is pulsed and it’s low-pitched magnitude dynamic (possibly by feeding it appetite by a hint opening and adjusting a circuitously curl for limit appetite collection).

STEP 2

The SEG routine causes a appetite spin in a L-C circuit to rise. Power is fed around a hint opening that produces a really pointy block call vigilance that contains any magnitude in it. The L-C circuit automatically resonates during it’s possess magnitude in a same approach that a bell always produces a same low-pitched magnitude when struck, no matter how it is struck.

STEP 3

The outlay waveform from a L-C circuit is afterwards manipulated to yield an outlay that oscillates during a magnitude on a inner mains supply (50 Hz or 60 Hz typically).

STEP 4

Finally, a oscillations are smoothed by filtering to yield mains-frequency outlay power.

COMMENT:   All of these processes are described in Kapanadze’s patents and so, no state or private trusted information is shown here. Kapanadze’s routine is a SEG process.

COMMENT:   As we see it, a categorical disproportion between a designs of Don Smith and Tariel Kapanadze is a inverter or modulator in a outlay circuit. At mains magnitude we need a outrageous transformer core in a absolute inverter.

Read a following tools to learn some-more secrets…

MODERN OPTION

Lowering a L-C magnitude to mains magnitude (Modulation)

COMMENTS:   It is probable to use block waves instead of sine waves to palliate a loading on a transistors. This is really matching to a outlay sections of Tariel Kapanadze’s patents. This routine does not need a absolute transformer with a outrageous core in sequence to yield 50 Hz or 60 Hz.

Don Smith’s option (guessed during by Patrick Kelly)

COMMENT:   There is no high-frequency high-voltage step-down transformer, though a step-down transformer is used for mains magnitude that means that it will need a outrageous core.

FOR BOTH SCHEMATICS:
You contingency select a bucket in sequence to get a limit appetite output. Very low, and really high loads will give roughly no appetite in a bucket (because a stream issuing in a outlay circuit is limited by a stream issuing in a low-pitched circuit).

ILLUSTRATIONS FOR FREQUENCY LOWERING

From Tariel Kapanadze

ENERGY GAIN
(REMARKS on 1.1 and 1.2 SECRETS)

We contingency cruise dual options:
1. Back-EMF termination . . . . . . . (1.1).
2. Excitation by a hint . . . . . . . . . (1.2).

THESE OPTIONS ARE DIFFERENT

However, in both cases, an boost of appetite occurs due to a charges being pumped in from a ground. In a vernacular of Mr. Tesla – “a assign funnel” or in complicated vernacular “a assign pump”.

1. In a initial case, a problem for a oscillating circuit is to “create” an electromagnetic margin that has a high appetite electrical member in ambient space. (Ideally, it is usually compulsory for a high-voltage capacitor be entirely charged once. After that, if a circuit is lossless, afterwards fluctuation will be confirmed indefinitely though a need for any serve submit power).

THIS IS A “BAIT” TO ATTRACT CHARGES FROM THE AMBIENT SPACE.

Only a little volume of appetite is indispensable to emanate such a “bait”…

Next, pierce a “bait” to one side of a circuit, a side that is a source of a charges (Ground). The subdivision between a “bait” and a charges is now so little that relapse occurs. The fundamental parasitic capacitance of a circuit will be now charged, formulating a voltage disproportion during a conflicting ends of a circuit, that in spin causes forged oscillations. The appetite contained in these oscillations is a appetite benefit that we wish to constraint and use. This appetite powers a load. This really useful electromagnetic margin containing a additional appetite oscillates in a instruction that is perpendicular to a instruction of fluctuation of a “bait” margin and since of this really critical difference, a outlay appetite oscillations do not destroy it. This critical means happens since a curl is wound with dual hostile halves. The parasitic oscillations gradually die out, flitting all of their appetite to a load.

This energy-gaining routine is repeated, hint by spark. The some-more mostly a hint occurs, a aloft a additional appetite outlay will be. That is, a aloft a hint magnitude (caused by a aloft voltage conflicting a hint gap), a aloft a appetite outlay and a larger a potency of a process. Hardly any additional “bait” appetite is ever required.

2. In a second box we contingency assign a capacitor circuit to an appetite spin aloft than that of a source appetite itself. At initial glance, this appears to be an unfit task, though a problem is solved utterly easily.

The charging complement is screened, or “blinded”, to use a vernacular of Mr. Tesla, so that it can't “see” a participation of a assign in a capacitor. To accomplish this, one finish of a capacitor is connected to a belligerent and a other finish is connected to a high-energy coil, a second finish of that is free. After joining to this aloft appetite spin from a energising coil, electrons from a belligerent can assign a capacitor to a really high level.

In this case, a charging complement does not “see” what assign is already in a capacitor. Each beat is treated as if it were a initial beat ever generated. Thus, a capacitor can strech a aloft appetite spin than that of a source itself.

After a accumulation of a energy, it is liberated to a bucket by a liberate hint gap. After that, a routine is steady again and again indefinitely …

THIS PROCESS DOES NOT REQUIRE THE SUPPRESSION OF BACK-EMF

3. It should be noted, that choice 1 and choice 2 above could be combined.

SECRET 2
SWITCHABLE INDUCTANCE

The inductance is comprised of dual coils that are positioned tighten to any other. Their connectors are shown in front.

CONSTRUCTION: When constructing this arrangement there are many conflicting options due to a several forms of core that can be used for a coils:

1. Air-core
2. A ferromagnetic bar core
3. A ferromagnetic toroidal core
4. A transformer character ferromagnetic core.

PROPERTIES: (tested many times with a accumulation of cores)
The value of a sum inductance LS does not change if we brief one of a inductors L1 or L2
(This might have been tested for a initial time by Mr. Tesla behind in a 19th century).

APPLICATION TECHNIQUE:
This appetite era is shaped on a asymmetrical process:
1. Feed a sum inductance LS with a stream we
2. Then short-circuit one of a inductors (say, L1)
3. Drain a appetite from inductor L2 into a capacitor
4. After dismissal L2, afterwards mislay a short-circuit from L1, short-circuit L2 and afterwards empty a appetite from L1 into a capacitor

QUESTION:   Is it possible, regulating this method, to get twice a appetite volume due to a asymmetry of a process, and if not, afterwards what is wrong?

AN ANSWER  : We need to start circuitous coils and behaving tests.

EXAMPLES OF COILS ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED

A curl was wound on a transformer ferromagnetic core (the stretch is not important) with permeability 2500 (not important) that was designed as a power-supply transformer. Each half-coil was 200 turns (not important), of 0.33 mm hole handle (not important). The sum inductance LS is about 2 mH (not important).

A curl was wound on a toroidal ferromagnetic core with permeability 1000 (not important). Each half-coil was 200 turns (not important), of 0.33 mm hole handle (not important). The sum inductance LS is about 4 mH (not important).

An typical laminated iron core transformer dictated for 50-60 Hz appetite supply use (size is not important) was wound with a curl placed on any of it’s dual halves. The sum inductance LS is about 100 mH (not important).

THE OBJECTIVE OF THE TESTS
To make tests to endorse a properties of a coils, and afterwards make measurements of a LS inductance both with curl L2 short-circuited and curl L2 not short-circuited, and afterwards review a results.

COMMENT:   All of a tests can be finished with usually a toroidal curl as a other coils have been shown to have a same properties. You can repeat these tests and endorse this for yourself.

OPTION 1

These elementary inductance measurements can be carried out with a assistance of an typical RLC (Resistance / Inductance / Capacitance) meter, such as a one shown here:

The measurements taken:
The sum curl inductance LS was totalled though short-circuited coils, a figure was recorded. The L2 curl was afterwards short-circuited and a inductance LS totalled again and a outcome recorded. Then, a formula of a dual measurements were compared.

The result: The inductance LS was unvaried (to an correctness of about a one percent).

OPTION 2
A special set-up was used, consisting of an analogue oscilloscope, a digital voltmeter and a vigilance generator, to magnitude a voltage on a inductance LS though L2 being short-circuited and afterwards with L2 short-circuited.

After a measurements were made, all of a formula were compared.

Schematic of a set-up:

The sequence in that a measurements were taken.
The voltage on a resistor was totalled regulating a oscilloscope and a voltage on a inductor was totalled regulating a voltmeter. Readings were taken before and after short-circuiting L2.

The result:   The voltages remained unvaried (to an correctness of about one percent).

Additional measurements

Before a above measurements were taken, a voltages conflicting L1 and L2 were measured. The voltage on both halves was a half of a voltage on a sum inductor LS.

COMMENT:   The magnitude of about 10 kHz was selected since a curl did not have parasitic resonances during this magnitude or during low frequencies. All measurements were steady regulating a curl with a ferromagnetic E-shaped transformer core. All of a formula were a same.

OPTION 3
Capacitor recharge.
The design was to review voltages on a capacitor, both before and after it being recharged by communication with an inductor that could be connected into a circuit around a switch.

The examination conditions
A capacitor is charged from a battery and is connected to a inductor by a initial diode (included to give insurance conflicting oscillations). At a impulse of feedback, half of a inductor is shunted by a second diode (due to it’s polarity), while a inductance contingency sojourn unchanged. If after recharging a capacitor a capacitor voltage is a same (but with topsy-turvy polarity), afterwards era will have taken place (because a half of a appetite stays in a shunted half of a inductor).

In theory, it is impossible, for an typical inductor consisting of dual coils to do this.

The outcome :

The outcome confirms a prediction – a remaining appetite is some-more than a capacitor gives to a curl (with an correctness of 20%).

Test components:
Capacitor 47 nano Farads, inductor LS is about 2 mH , Shotky silicon diodes BAT42, voltage used: 12 V.

THE RESULT VERIFICATION FOR OPTION 3
For corroboration of these formula and in sequence to urge a accuracy, all measurements were steady regulating choice components.

Test components: Capacitor: 1.5 nano Farads; sum inductance: 1.6 mH, germanium diodes: (Russian) D311, charging voltage: 5V.

The result: Confirmation of a prior measurements (a) shown below

(a)                                                                             (b)

The recharging correctness was softened to 10 percent. Also, a check dimensions was finished without a second diode. The outcome was radically a same as a dimensions that used a shunting diode. The blank 10 percent of a voltage can be explained as waste due to a widespread capacitor’s inductance and in it’s resistance.

CONTINUED TESTING
The shunting diode was topsy-turvy and a exam achieved again:

   

The result: It seems that a assign is mark on…

Further testing

An oscilloscope was connected to a curl instead of to a capacitor, in sequence to equivocate change of a initial diode so a oscillations noticed were shaped on a inductance of a widespread capacitors.

   

   

The result: The correctness of capacitor recharging was softened to 5 percent (due to a dismissal of a change of a initial diode). After a categorical capacitor was switched off (by a diode), we can see oscillations caused by a widespread capacitance of a inductors. Based on a magnitude of a oscillations that were 4 to 5 times aloft than that of a categorical capacitor, one can guess a widespread capacitance as being 16 to 25 times reduce than a categorical capacitor.

Still serve testing
Testing of a fluctuation circuit shunting, with a dual cases sum (and though a initial diode):

   

The result: A contour (oscillation circuit) is not destroyed, though it is shunted a lot. One can explain it by deliberation a moments when both diodes are conducting and so, shunt a circuit. As an addition, a voltage on a down diode is shown (the time scale is stretched). The disastrous voltage is tighten to maximum.

Still serve testing

Charging a capacitor by shunting stream in fluctuation mode.

   

   

Conditions:   The serve of a charging capacitor of 47 nano Farads.

The result: A capacitor is charging though shunting a circuit. The final voltage on it is 0.8 V, and rises an falls of a voltage count on a value of a capacitor.

THE OVERALL RESULTS OF THE TESTS (OPTIONS 1, 2 and 3)
The balance of communication in systems with electromagnetic margin feedback (as with switched inductance) appears to be violated, and this implies that this arrangement could be used to beget energy.

COMMENT:   You need to select a bucket in sequence to get a limit appetite output. Very low, and really high loads, will send roughly no appetite to a load.

ILLUSTRATION FOR SWITCHABLE INDUCTANCE

EXPLANATION:   The circuit has dual kinds of currents: a categorical stream and a shunting current.

The categorical and a shunting currents run by a same outlay capacitor in one direction, if a outlay capacitor is discharged.

There is no shunting current, if a outlay capacitor is charged.

ILLUSTRATION FOR SWITCHABLE INDUCTANCE
From Don Smith

EXPLANATION: As Don Smith said, dual detector receivers were combined, and one FE device was constructed.

COMMENT: Don Smith assembled this reason as a PDF file; maybe you’ll be means to find it on a internet.
COMMENT: The insurgency of a bucket contingency be selected so as to get a limit probable appetite in it.
COMMENT: The “board” does not enclose an outlay circuit, since a integrate of hint gaps and one step-down transformer can be used instead of diodes and a capacitor (this was pointe

MECHANICAL (INERTIAL) ANALOGUE OF SWITCHABLE INDUCTANCE
From Tariel Kapanadze

EXPLANATION: When one pendulum is interlude a other is accelerating. The determining resource connects a pendulums to a outlay generator one after a other and so maintains a oscillations.

CONNECTING EXTRA MASS TO A MECHANICAL OSCILLATOR

EXPLANATION:   Mechanical appetite can be stored in any open by compressing it or stretching it (1). It corresponds to dual positions in a automatic oscillator (2), when usually appetite appetite takes place in an oscillating process

EXPLANATION:   If additional mass is joining intermittently to one side or a other, of a automatic oscillator, it will be changeable though any appetite detriment during a fluctuation process.

THE PRINCIPLE OF AMPLIFICATION OF MECHANICAL ENERGY

EXPLANATION:   The element is shaped on an asymmetrical flywheel (1) consisting of a little mass and a vast mass. These masses are offset conflicting a centre of rotation, that is, are located during a stretch proportional to their weights, from a core of rotation. This helps to equivocate quivering when they are rotating (the same element used when balancing a automobile wheel).

The inertial impulse of such a flywheel (1) is equivalent to a inertial moments of flywheels (2) and (3), consisting usually of vast or little masses. However, from a indicate of perspective of kinetic energy, all of these examples, (1), (2) and (3) are different. This is since a kinetic appetite of any mass depends on a instruction and speed during that it moves (if is expelled during rotation). The top common kinetic appetite is in a masses of flywheel (3), as reduction appetite is contained in flywheel (1) and a smallest kinetic appetite is in flywheel (2). In sequence to get an boost in appetite one needs to grasp a set-up that is shaped on a open (for appetite mutation from kinetic appetite to appetite appetite and behind again) and a push of Archimedes (for changing a indicate where a force is applied).

Comments:
1. The simplified schematic diagrams shown here are for reason functions only.
2. In an tangible device, we can use a open in revolution mode (as Tariel Kapanadze did).
3. You can use disks and rings as flywheel masses (as Tariel Kapanadze did).
4. Altering one mass to another is indeed achieved by joining them in several ways.

Comment:   Any asymmetrical automatic oscillator behaves as indicated above, when a appetite appetite of a dense open is remade into a kinetic appetite of relocating masses.

The appetite appetite of a open is distributed unequally between a little and vast masses. A little mass acquires some-more appetite relations to it’s stretch than a vast mass does. The sum of a kinetic energies of both masses is equal to a appetite appetite of a spring.

Comment:   This is shaped on Tesla’s asymmetrical schematic:

FLYWHEEL – A HIDDEN FORM OF ENERGY
(Clarifications on automatic appetite amplification)

EXPLANATION:   If we don’t wish to mislay automatic appetite when doing work, afterwards this work contingency be finished by an imaging force. This force is absent in an inertial coordinate system, though it is benefaction in a non-inertial coordinate system. When in a rotational coordinate complement this force is called ‘centrifugal’ force.

Comment:   After a work is done, a centrifugal force is low and if we wish to continue producing automatic work, we have to use the other coordinate complement where centrifugal force is high again. This is probable since linear quickness does not change. You have to yield the other support indicate usually (and a cord) in sequence to furnish automatic appetite again.

Comment:   If we wish to make this automatic work continuous, afterwards a finish of a initial lane contingency also be a commencement of a second track. You have to change coordinate complement periodically.

Comment:   In a genuine situation, we have to recompense for appetite detriment due to attrition and so a partial of a additional appetite contingency be used to contend a process.

ILLUSTRATION FOR SWITCHABLE INDUCTANCE
From Alfred Hubbard

EXPLANATION:   The core curl and all of a marginal coils can “grasp” a same motion entrance from a inflection coil. All other sum are a same as in Smith’s version.

COMMENTS:   In other words, we can use rods as a curl core, instead of a sealed ferromagnetic core.  
But, this is not a usually choice in Hubbard’s device. He might have had another one, shaped on a conflicting principle, maybe a element of appetite loudness in an LC circuit as described earlier, though with switchable inductance being used.

MODERN OPTIONS?
In switchable inductance

Version 1
A curl has some-more inductance when some of it’s tools are short-circuited:

   

EXPLANATION:   The executive territory of a curl and it’s dual finish sections are wound in conflicting directions.

COMMENT:   The curl shown in a design above has twice a inductance, when it’s finish sections are short-circuited (measurements finished with a Chinese-built RLC exam scale shown here:

But, this looks like inflection in an asymmetrical transformer ?????

Version 3
By Tariel Kapanadze

No outline …???

Read on for serve details….

THE BASIS OF SWITCHABLE INDUCTANCES

(Tesla patent)

SECRET 3

THE ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER

With a captivating margin feedback loop (evolution of a 2nd secret)

LENZ LAW IS VIOLATED IN AN ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER
(Therefore it is not probable to use it as an typical transformer)

An asymmetrical transformer can have dual coils: L2 and LS. Coil L2 is wound on one side of a toroidal core while LS is wound so that it encloses both a toroid and a curl L2 as shown here:

         

Optionally, this arrangement can be implemented with a far-reaching operation of styles of transformer core:

         

One choice is to use a above (switched inductor) arrangement and supplement one some-more coil:

         

Now that we know a operational beliefs of this system, we can use any pattern that we need. For example:

ILLUSTRATION FOR AN ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER OF SOME KIND

THE MECHANICAL EQUIVALENT OF AN ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER

This instance shows an typical transformer, wound on an E-core and an outmost excitation magnet:

In other words: L2 is still used, though instead of LS a sparkling magnet is used.

The result:
1. The voltage grown conflicting curl L2 depends on a series of turns in L2, but a short-circuit stream by L2 does NOT count on a series of turns in curl L2.

2. You need to select a bucket connected to L2 in sequence to get a limit appetite output. Very low, and really high loads, will give roughly no appetite output.

RESONANCE IN AN ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER

The initial curl is used as a conductor of energy, and a second curl as a receiver of energy.

It is really like radio broadcasting, where a receiver is located distant divided from a transmitter, and has no feedback. The initial curl works in parallel resonance and a second curl in serial resonance (although a dual schematic diagrams demeanour alike).

CONSEQUENTLY:   You can get many some-more voltage on L2 than on LS

An experiment:

Conditions:
The inflection magnitude is about 10 kHz. The sum inductance LS is 2.2 mH, a L2 inductance (same as a L1 inductance) is 100 mH, a ratio LS:L2 is 1:45 with an E-shape core, permeability is 2500.

The result:
At a inflection frequency, there can be a voltage that is 50 times some-more on any tools (L1 or L2) matched with a sum curl LS, and voltage changes on R are no some-more 15 percent.

The proviso change in voltage is about 90 degrees between LS and L2.


(The amplitudes were equalised)

Further
An additional step-down curl LD was wound around L2, turns ratio 50:1 (matched with L2), and a bucket resistor RL = 100 Ohms was connected to it.

The result
Changes in stream expenditure (estimated by measuring a voltage conflicting R) are no some-more 15 percent.

MODERN OPTIONS IN USAGE OF AN
Asymmetrical transformer
By Don Smith

The schematic is like this:

   

COMMENTS:   Between sparks, L2 has a voltage on it’s ends. If RL is connected directly to L2 afterwards there will be no outlay stream though inflection and there will be no outlay stream though a spark.

MORE ACCURATE:

COMMENTS:   L2 has no voltage on it’s ends (without a spark). This is typical back-EMF suppression, invented by Nikola Tesla.

COMMENT:   L2 has no voltage on it’s ends (without a spark).

Secret 3.1
THE ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER BASED
ON THE SHORT-CIRCUITED COIL

INTRODUCTION

Remark: Voltage placement on a shorted curl depends on a position of a sparkling coil.

DESCRIPTION

CASE 1   The excitation curl is centered:

Result:   We have a full duration of a voltage placement on a short-circuited coil

CONSTRUCTION OF THE ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER  
based on a short-circuited coil

CASE 1   The short-circuited curl is wound in one instruction

Result:   The outlay does not change a submit in any way.

Explanation:   The vigilance from a outlay curl generates 0 voltage disproportion on a submit coil.

Remark:   The position of a coils should be practiced in sequence to give a best result.

CASE 2   The short-circuited curl is wound in conflicting directions from a centre outwards, and usually half of a curl is short-circuited:

Result:   The outlay has no change on a submit coil

Explanation:   The vigilance from a outlay curl generates 0 voltage disproportion on a submit coil.

Remark:   The position of a submit curl needs to be practiced to get a best result.

Remark:   The coil’s position depends on permeability of a core. More permeability means some-more comparison with placement forked during a beginning.

Best Position:   To find a best curl position, bond a vigilance generator to a output, and afterwards find a curl position that shows 0 during a submit terminals. Alternatively, use an RLC scale connected to a submit terminals and afterwards find a curl position that gives no change in reading when a outlay terminals are short-circuited (for both box 1 and box 2).

Comment: The length of a wire, a sum length of a coil, and a hole of a curl are not important. The series of turns in a submit and outlay coils plays a same purpose as in an typical transformer, for both box 1 and box 2.

MODERN APPLICATIONS FOR SHORT-CIRCUITED COILS
By Don Smith

CASE 1

CASE 2

REMARK:   The position of a coils contingency be practiced until a outlay has 0 change on a input.

REMEMBER:   None of a (input) appetite used for sparkling ambient space should seem in a load.

AN EXAMPLE OF CASE 2

By Don Smith

COMMENTS:   The outlay curl can be practiced to ring with a submit coil, though this is not critical for bargain a principle. Excitation with usually one hint is probable (not in resonance), though a magnitude of a sparks influences a outlay appetite directly.

COMMENTS:   The low-pitched magnitude of a circuit is about 60-70 kHz, though dimmer is for 30-35 kHz.  Voltage/frequency record was used for adjusting a excitation frequency.  Two parameters have to be adjusted: a position of a slider and a excitation frequency.

MODERN APPLICATION FOR SHORT-CIRCUITED COILS
By William Barbat

US Patent Application series 2007/0007844

Self-Sustaining Electric-Power Generator Utilizing Electrons of Low Inertial Mass to Magnify Inductive Energy

COMMENT:   In sequence to know this device, we have to review Barbat’s obvious focus US 2007/0007844 A1:  
available here

COMMENT:   we would like to indicate out that externally, it looks really many like Alfred Hubbard’s device.

AN EXAMPLE OF CASE 1
By Tariel Kapanadze

COMMENT:   Adjust a positions of a coils to get a best result.

AN EXAMPLE OF CASE 1

By Steven Mark

TPU

REMARK: An thought – an asymmetrical transformer shaped on a shorted-circuited coil:

               

REMARK:   The positions of a coils contingency be scrupulously adjusted, in sequence to have no delivery feedback from a outlay to a input. To know this better, review a partial that is clinging to switchable inductance.

EXPLANATION:

THE BASIS OF THE TPU

(Tesla Patent)

REMEMBER:
The position of a coils contingency be adjusted. The easiest approach to do this is to supplement or mislay turns during a ends of a coils.

AN EXAMPLE OF CASE 2

By Tariel Kapanadze

Mechanical device

               

MODERN USE OF SHORT-CIRCUITED COILS
by Cherepanov Valera (‘SR193’ in Russian forum)

COMMENT:   This arrangement does not have an OU effect, though it can be used for back-EMF termination in inflection (spark excited) mode to get a laser outcome (very sparkling summation effects).

COMMENT:   This was copied from this device of Tariel Kapanadze (???).

Don Smith

COMMENT:   Mr. Tesla said: “The best propinquity for a categorical and additional curl is 3/4L and L/4”. Is that ratio used here?

COMMENT:   If we don’t know this schematic, demeanour during simplest chronicle of a coil.

COMMENT: This is an instance of box 1 where a outlay curl was removed, and some of a turns of a short-circuited curl were used instead.

THE ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER (BASED ON A SHORT-CIRCUITED COIL)
COMBINED WITH A STEP-DOWN TRANSFORMER?
By Don Smith

THE RELATIONSHIPS of Don Smith’s TPU stretch and position are important.

REMARK: Those relations are used to furnish an asymmetrical transformer

MECHANICAL ANALOGUE OF THE
ASYMMETRICAL TRANSFORMER
CASE 2
By Don Smith

Schematic:

REMEMBER:   Any asymmetrical transformer contingency be adjusted.

REMARK:   Don Smith placed magnets inside a coils, though that is not critical for bargain a routine as his device does not review a schematic.

SOME REMARKS ON ASYMMETRICAL IN-FRONT CONNECTION
(Useful remarks)

Some turns were combined on one half of a coil, and some turns were private from a other half. An additional captivating margin H3 was created, with inductance – LD.

RESULT:   A vast partial of a sum inductance acts as an inductor, and a little partial acts as a capacitor.
This is a good famous fact (read books). The sum voltage on a curl is reduction than on it’s halves.

Here is a outcome of a capacitor discharging into this coil:

SECRET 4
CURRENT AMPLIFICATION

If a lot of uneven transformers are placed with a common motion upsurge by them, they will have no change on this motion flow, as any one uneven transformer does not have any change on a motion flow. If a delegate L2 transformer coils are afterwards connected in parallel, this produces stream amplification.

AS A RESULT
You have an uneven transformer organised in a stack:

For prosaic (uniform) margin inside of LS, it can be organised with additional turns during it’s ends.

EXAMPLES OF COILS WHICH WERE ACTUALLY CONSTRUCTED

The coils are assembled from 5 sections, finished from E-type ferrite core with a permeability of 2500, and wound regulating plastic-covered wire. The executive sections L2 have 25 turns, and corner sections have 36 turns (to equalize a voltage on them). All sections are connected in parallel. The curl LS has captivating field-flattening during it’s ends, and a single-layer circuitous LS was used, a series of turns depending on a hole of a handle used.

The stream loudness for these sold coils is 4 times.
Changing LS inductance is 3% (if L2 is short-circuited)

SECRET 5
The appetite source in Nikola Tesla automobile “Red arrow” is
FERROMAGNETIC RESONANCE

COMMENT:   To know electromagnetic feedback, we contingency cruise a movement to be like that of domains that have a organisation behaviour, or alternatively, spin waves (like a quarrel of station dominos descending over where any one is defeated by a prior one attack it).

THE BASIS OF FERROMAGNETIC RESONANCE

When a ferromagnetic element is placed in a captivating field, it can catch outmost electromagnetic deviation in a instruction perpendicular to a instruction of a captivating field, that will means ferromagnetic inflection during a scold frequency.

This is an energy-amplifying transformer invented by Mr. Tesla.

QUESTION:   What use is a ferromagnetic rod in Free-Energy devices?

AN ANSWER:   It can change magnetisation of a element along captivating margin instruction though a need for a absolute outmost force.

QUESTION:   Is it loyal that a low-pitched frequencies for ferromagnetics are in a tens of Gigahertz range?

AN ANSWER:   Yes, it is true, and a magnitude of ferromagnetic inflection depends on a outmost captivating margin (high margin = high frequency). But with ferromagnetics it is probable to get inflection though requesting any outmost captivating field, this is a supposed “natural ferromagnetic resonance”. In this case, a captivating margin is tangible by a inner magnetisation of a sample. Here, a fullness frequencies start in a far-reaching band, due to a vast variations probable in a conditions of magnetisation, and so we contingency use a far-reaching rope of frequencies to get ferromagnetic resonance.

A POSSIBLE PROCESS FOR ACQUIRING FREE-ENERGY

1. Subjecting a ferromagnetic to a brief electromagnetic beat even though an outmost captivating field, causes a merger of spin precession (domains will have organisation behaviour, and so ferromagnetics can simply be magnetised).

2. Magnetisation of ferromagnetics can be by an outmost captivating field.

3. Energy merger can be as a outcome of clever representation magnetisation caused by an outmost captivating margin of obtuse strength.

COMMENT:   You contingency use synchronisation for processes of irradiation and magnetisation of a sample.

USEFUL COMMENT:   A ferromagnetic defense will not destroy a inductance of any curl placed inside it, supposing that a ends of that curl are positioned on one side of a coil.

But, this curl can magnetize a ferromagnetic shield.

SECRET 5 CONTINUATION …
TWO PERPENDICULAR COILS ON A COMMON AXIS

(Standing waves, spin waves, domino effect, laser effect, open resonator, etc…)

EXPLANATION:   Standing waves can be vehement not usually in Tesla’s “horseshoe” magnet, though also in Tesla’s ferromagnetic transformer (excited by sparks…

COMMENT:   Excitation can be organised in conflicting ways, by coils connection. The frequencies of oscillations in a curl depends on a series of turns in it (a vast movement is probable due to this factor).

ACTUAL COILS

COMMENT:   The positions of a coils on a rods depends on whatever ferromagnetic element is being used, and on it’s size. The best arrangement has to be dynamic by experimentation.

A transformer can have dual pairs of coils: sparkling (tubes), inflection or bucket (inside)
see Tesla’s picture.

TOROIDAL VERSION OF AN ASYMMETRIC STACKED TRANSFORMER
An inductor L2 is placed on a executive ring between a short-circuits of a core, and a curl LS (not shown) is wound around all 3 rings, covering a whole of a toroid – this is an typical toroidal coil.


The series of short-circuits depends on your requirements, and influences on a stream amplification.

THAT’S ALL – GOOD LUCK …


CONCLUSIONS

1. The Energy-Conservation Law is a outcome (not reason) of exquisite interaction.

2. The simplest approach to destroy exquisite communication is by regulating electromagnetic margin feedback.

3. All asymmetrical systems are outward a area lonesome by a Energy-Conservation Law.

THE ENERGY CONSERVATION LAW CANNOT BE VIOLATED
(The margin lonesome by this law is usually exquisite interactions)

Article source: http://www.free-energy-info.com/Utkin.htm

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *

*

code