Energy process of a United States

نوشته شده در موضوع تولید انرژی رایگان در 18 مارس 2016

The energy process of a United States is dynamic by federal, state, and inner entities in a United States, that residence issues of appetite production, distribution, and consumption, such as building codes and gas mileage standards. Energy process might embody legislation, general treaties, subsidies and incentives to investment, discipline for appetite conservation, taxation and other open process techniques.

Several mandates have been due over a years, such as gasoline will never surpass $1.00/gallon (Nixon), and the United States will never again import as many oil as it did in 1977 (Carter),[1] yet no extensive long-term appetite process has been proposed, nonetheless there has been regard over this failure.[2] Three Energy Policy Acts have been passed, in 1992, 2005, and 2007,[3] that embody many reserve for conservation, such as a Energy Star program, and appetite development, with grants and taxation incentives for both renewable appetite and non-renewable energy.

There is also critique that sovereign appetite policies given a 1973 oil predicament have been dominated by crisis-mentality thinking, compelling costly discerning fixes and single-shot solutions that omit marketplace and record realities. Instead of providing fast manners that support simple examine while withdrawal copiousness of operation for American entrepreneurship and innovation, congresses and presidents have regularly corroborated policies that pledge solutions that are politically expedient, yet whose prospects are doubtful, yet adequate care of a dollar costs, environmental costs, or inhabitant certainty costs of their actions.[4][5]

State-specific energy-efficiency inducement programs also play a poignant purpose in a altogether appetite process of a United States.[6] The United States refused to validate a Kyoto Protocol, preferring to let a marketplace expostulate CO2 reductions to lessen tellurian warming, that will need CO2 glimmer taxation. The administration of Barack Obama has due an assertive appetite process reform, including a need for a rebate of CO2 emissions, with a tip and trade program, that could assistance inspire some-more purify renewable, tolerable appetite development.[7] Thanks to new technologies such as fracking, a United States has in 2014 resumed a former purpose as a tip oil writer in a world.[8]

History[edit]

In a Colonial epoch a appetite process of a United States was for giveaway use of hire joist for heating and industry. In a 19th century, new significance was placed on entrance to spark and a use for transport, heating and industry. Whales were rendered into flare oil.[9] Later, spark gas was fractionated for use as lighting and city gas. Natural gas was initial used in America for lighting in 1816.,[10] it has grown in significance for use in homes, industry, and appetite plants, yet healthy gas prolongation reached a U.S. rise in 1973,[11] and a cost has risen significantly given then.

Coal supposing a bulk of a US appetite needs good into a 20th century. Most civic homes had a spark bin and a spark dismissed furnace. Over a years these were transposed with oil furnaces, not given of it being cheaper yet given it was easier and safer.[12] Coal stays distant cheaper than oil. The biggest use of oil has come from a growth of a automobile.

Oil became increasingly critical to a United States, and, from a early 1940s, a U.S. supervision and oil attention entered into a jointly profitable partnership to control tellurian oil resources.[13] By 1950, oil outlay exceeded that of coal.[14][15] The contentment of oil in California, Texas, Oklahoma, as good as in Canada and Mexico, joined with a low cost, palliate of transportation, high appetite density, and use in inner explosion engines, lead to a augmenting use.[16]

Following World War II, oil heating boilers took over from spark burners along a Eastern Seaboard; diesel locomotives took over from coal-fired steam engines underneath dieselisation; oil-fired electricity plants were built; petroleum-burning buses transposed electric streetcars in a GM driven conspiracy, for that they were found guilty, and adults bought gasoline powered cars. Interstate Highways helped make cars a vital means of personal transportation.[16] As oil imports increased, US unfamiliar process was inexorably drawn into Middle East politics, subordinate oil-producing Saudi Arabia and patrolling a sea lanes of a Persian Gulf.[17]

Hydroelectricity was a basement of Nikola Tesla’s introduction of a U.S. electricity grid, starting during Niagara Falls, NY in 1883.[18] Electricity generated by vital dams like a Jensen Dam, TVA Project, Grand Coulee Dam and Hoover Dam still furnish some of a lowest-priced ($0.08/kWh), purify electricity in America. Rural foundation strung appetite lines to many some-more areas.[9][19]

Utilities have their rates set to acquire a income tide that provides them with a consistent 10% – 13% rate of lapse formed on handling costs. Increases or decreases of a handling costs of electricity prolongation are upheld directly by to a consumers.[20][unreliable source?]

The sovereign supervision supposing roughly incomparable subsidies to hoary fuels than to renewables in a 2002–2008 period. Subsidies to hoary fuels totaled approximately $72 billion over a examine period, representing a approach cost to taxpayers. Subsidies for renewable fuels, totaled $29 billion over a same period.[21]

In some cases, a U.S. has used a appetite process as a means to pursue other general goals. Richard Heinberg, a highbrow from Santa Rosa, California argues that a declassified CIA ask shows that a U.S. used oil prices as precedence opposite a economy of a Soviet Union. Specifically, he argues that a U.S. intentionally worked with Saudi Arabia during a Reagan administration to keep oil prices low, so dwindling a purchasing appetite of a Soviet Union’s petroleum trade industry. When sum with other U.S. efforts to empty Soviet resources, this was eventually a vital means in a retraction of a Soviet Union.[22]

Energy imports[edit]

The United States receives approximately 84% of a appetite from hoary fuels.[23] This appetite is used for transport, industry, and domestic use. The remaining apportionment comes essentially from Hydro and Nuclear stations.[24]Americans consecrate rebate than 5% of a world’s population, yet devour 26% of a world’s energy[25] to furnish 26% of a world’s industrial output. They comment for about 25% of a world’s petroleum consumption, while producing customarily 6% of a world’s annual petroleum supply.[26]

Almost all of Canada’s appetite exports go to a United States, creation it a largest unfamiliar source of U.S. appetite imports. Canada is a tip source of U.S. imports of oil, gas. and electricity.[27]

Petroleum[edit]

In 2012, a US constructed 60% of a petroleum it used, a residue being imported. The largest sources of alien oil were Canada, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Venezuela, and Russia. Oil imports into a US appearance in 2005, when imports granted 60% of US consumption; they have declined since, due both to augmenting domestic oil production, and reduced consumption.[28]

The 1973 oil embargo highlighted a disadvantage of a United States to oil supply disruptions when it depends on imports from nations that are possibly politically inconstant or against to US interests. Perceived remedies embody measures to revoke approach for petroleum (such as charge or choice fuels), boost a supply of petroleum (by augmenting domestic production, or progressing petroleum reserves), or raise a trustworthiness of unfamiliar imports (through unfamiliar policy).[29] The Federal Department of Energy was started to approach a several approaches.[30]

Conservation. A National Maximum Speed Limit of 55 mph (88 km/h) was imposed to assistance revoke consumption, and Corporate Average Fuel Economy (aka CAFE) standards were enacted to downsize car categories.[31] Year-round Daylight Saving Time was imposed, a United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve was sum and a National Energy Act of 1978 was introduced. Alternate forms of appetite and diversified oil supply resulted.[32]

Re-design of cities, telecommuting, mass transit, aloft housing firmness and walking could also revoke car fuel consumption.[33] Carpooling, flexcars, Smart cars, and shorter commutes could all revoke fuel use.[34][35]

Increasing supply. The United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve was sum to enlarge supply in box of a inhabitant emergency.[32]

Alternative fuels. Two-thirds of U.S. oil outlay is in a travel sector.[36] The US – an critical trade republic for food bonds – converted approximately 18% of a pellet outlay to ethanol in 2008. Across a US, 25% of a whole corn stand went to ethanol in 2007.[37] The commission of corn going to biofuel is approaching to go up.[38] In 2006, U.S. Senators introduced a BioFuels Security Act.[39]

The offer has been done for a hydrogen economy, in that cars and factories would be powered by hydrogen fuel cells. However, appetite would have to be used to furnish a hydrogen, and hydrogen cars have been called one of a slightest efficient, many costly ways to revoke hothouse gases.[40][41] Other skeleton embody creation multitude CO neutral and regulating renewable energy, including solar, wind, and methane sources.

It has been suggested that automobiles could be powered by a following forms of energy: 60% by grid electricity, 20% by biofuels, and 20% by approach solar. Re-design of cities, telecommuting, mass transit, aloft housing firmness and walking could also revoke car fuel consumption.[33]

Enhance trustworthiness of unfamiliar sources One purpose of American unfamiliar policy, generally in a Middle East, is ordinarily seen as securing a continued upsurge of petroleum exports from a region.

The due Keystone XL tube from Canada is widely viewed as a approach to raise a certainty of US petroleum supply.[42]

Natural gas[edit]

The United States is a net importer of healthy gas, many of it by tube from Canada, with a smaller volume of LNG from other sources. Net gas imports into a US appearance in 2007, when a republic alien 16.4 percent of a healthy gas it consumed, and was a world’s largest net importer of healthy gas.[43] By 2013, notwithstanding flourishing use of healthy gas in a US, net imports had depressed to 5.0 percent of consumption.[44]

Coal[edit]

The United States mines some-more spark than it uses, and is an exporter of coal.[45]

Electricity[edit]

The United States is a net importer of electricity from Canada, and a net exporter to Mexico. Overall, in 2012 a US had net electricity imports of 47 thousand gigawatt-hours, that was rebate than 1.2% of a electrical appetite generated within a US.[46]

Nuclear appetite in a United States depends mostly on alien uranium. In 2011, US uranium mining supposing 8 percent of a uranium combine commissioned into chief reactors.[47] The residue was imported. Principal sources of alien uranium were Russia, Canada, Australia, Kazakhstan, and Namibia.[48]

Energy consumption[edit]

Buildings and their construction devour some-more appetite than travel or industrial applications, and given buildings are obliged for a largest apportionment of hothouse emissions, they have a largest impact on synthetic meridian change. The AIA has due creation buildings CO neutral by 2030, definition that a construction and operation of buildings will not need hoary fuel appetite or evacuate hothouse gases, and carrying a U.S. revoke CO2 emissions to 40 to 60% subsequent 1990 levels by 2050.[49]

Energy outlay can change widely from state to state in a U.S. In 2012 for example, there was a vast opening in electricity outlay by state between a tip 3 states – Louisiana (1254 kWh/mo.), Tennessee (1217 kWh/mo.) and Mississippi (1193 kWh/mo.) – and a bottom 3 states – Maine (531 kWh/mo.), Hawaii (544 kWh/mo.) and Vermont (565 kWh/mo.).[50]

When President Carter sum a U.S. Department of Energy in 1977, one of their initial successful projects was a Weatherization Assistance Program.[51] During a final 30 years, this module has supposing services to some-more than 5.5 million low-income families. On average, low-cost weatherization reduces heating bills by 31% and altogether appetite bills by $358 per year during stream prices. Increased appetite potency and weatherization spending has a high lapse on investment.[52]

The “Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007” has a poignant impact on U.S. Energy Policy. It includes appropriation to assistance urge building codes, and will make it bootleg to sell illuminated light bulbs, as they are rebate fit than fluorescents and LEDs.[3]

Technologies such as pacifist solar building pattern and 0 appetite buildings (ZEB) have demonstrated poignant new-construction appetite check reductions. The “Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007” includes appropriation to boost a recognition of ZEBs, photovoltaics, and even a new solar atmosphere conditioning program. Many energy-saving measures can be sum to existent buildings as retrofits, yet others are customarily cost-effective in new construction, that is given building formula improvements are being encouraged. The resolution requires both softened incentives for appetite conservation, and new appetite sources.

The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 increases normal gas mileage to 35 mpg by 2020. The stream administration and 2007 legislation are enlivening a near-term use of plug-in electric cars, and hydrogen cars by 2020. Toyota has suggested that their third-generation 2009 Prius[53] might cost many rebate than a stream model.[54] Larger advanced-technology batteries have been suggested to make it plug-in rechargeable. Photovoltaics are an choice being discussed to extend a daytime electric pushing range. Improving solar dungeon potency factors will continue to make this a gradually more-cost-effective option.

Sources[edit]

About 82% of all forms of appetite used in a United States is subsequent from hoary fuels. In 2014, a largest source of a country’s appetite came from petroleum (35%), followed by healthy gas (28%), spark (18%), renewable sources (10%) and chief appetite (8%).[55]Amory Lovins says that a pointy and solid cost reductions in solar appetite has been a “stunning marketplace success”. He says that solar, breeze and inexpensive healthy gas have significantly reduced a prospects of spark and chief appetite plants around a world. John Rowe, chair of Exelon (the largest chief appetite writer in a US), has conspicuous that a chief rebirth is dead.[56]

Petroleum[edit]

In 2006, a U.S. consumed 20.8 million barrels (3,310,000 m3) of petroleum a day,[57] of that 9 million barrels (1,400,000 m3) is engine gasoline. Transportation is a largest consumer, accounting for approximately 68.9%,[58] and 55% of oil use worldwide as documented in a Hirsch report. With approximately 5% of a world’s population, a United States is obliged for approximately 25% of annual tellurian oil outlay and according to 2008 estimates has a per-person daily outlay rate some-more than double that of a European Union.[59][60]Automobiles are a singular largest consumer of oil,[61] immoderate 40%, and are also a source of 20% of a nation’s hothouse gas emissions.[62]

The USA has about 22 billion barrels (3.5×109 m3) pot while immoderate about 7.6 billion barrels (1.21×109 m3) per year.[57] This has sum vigour for additional drilling. European gasoline prices were artificially lifted to $4 per gallon by taxation prolonged before they reached $4/gallon in a U.S., heading to softened fuel economy.[63][64]

Problems compared with oil supply embody flighty oil prices, augmenting universe and domestic petroleum product demand, coherence on inconstant alien unfamiliar oil, descending domestic prolongation (peak oil), and disappearing infrastructure, like a Alaska tube and oil refineries.

American coherence on imports grew from 10% in 1970 to 65% by a finish of 2004.[65] The Energy Information Administration projects that U.S. oil imports will sojourn prosaic and outlay will grow, so net imports will diminution to 54% of U.S. oil outlay by 2030.[66]

The theme of continued scrutiny for offshore drilling in a United States is a long-lived debate, one that was heavily shabby in 2010 by a BP Macondo oil brief in a Gulf of Mexico.

Coal[edit]

America is self-sufficient in coal.[67] Indeed, it has several hundred years’ supply of it.[68][69] The United States trend in spark use has been rising from 1950 by 2007, when spark prolongation and outlay some-more than doubled.[70] The race of a US has roughly doubled in this time duration as well, while a per capita appetite use has been disappearing given 1978.[71][72]

Most electricity (52% in 2000) in a republic is generated from coal-fired appetite plants:[9] in 2006, some-more than 90% of spark consumed was used to beget electricity. In 1950, about 19% percent of a spark consumed was for electricity generation.[73]

In terms of a prolongation of appetite from domestic sources, from 1885 by 1951, spark was a heading source of appetite in a United States. Crude oil and healthy gas afterwards vied for that purpose until 1982. Coal regained a position of a tip domestic apparatus that year and again in 1984, and has defended it since.[74] The US browns 1 billion tons of spark any year.

Concern for meridian change has led to a call for a duration on all spark consumption, unless CO constraint is utilized. Coal is a largest intensity source of CO2 emissions.[75][76][77]

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) is a cleanest now operational coal-fired electricity epoch technology. FutureGen is an initial U.S. examine devise to examine a probability of sequestering IGCC CO2 emissions underground.

Natural gas[edit]

Natural gas prolongation and outlay quadrupled between 1950 and 1970 to 20×10^12 cu ft (570 km3), yet declined customarily to stabilise in 1986. Since then, a United States imports a rising share of a gas. In 2008 outlay of healthy gas stood during 23.2×10^12 cu ft (660 km3), while domestic prolongation was during 20.6×10^12 cu ft (580 km3). Approximately 3.0×10^12 cu ft (85 km3) were imported, especially by pipelines from Canada, that accounted for 90% of unfamiliar supplies, while a residue is delivered by liquefied healthy gas (LNG) tankers carrying gas from 5 opposite countries.[78]

The largest gas producing states in 2007 were Texas (30%), Wyoming (10%), Oklahoma (9%) and New Mexico (8%), while 14% of a country’s prolongation came from a sovereign offshore lands in a Gulf of Mexico.[78] Recent growth in hydraulic fracturing and plane drilling have augmenting seductiveness for shale gas opposite a United States in new years. Leading fields are a Barnett Shale in Texas and a Antrim Shale in Michigan. Natural gas pot in a United States were 35% aloft in 2008 than dual years progressing mostly due to shale gas discoveries.[79]

Nuclear power[edit]

The United States is a world’s largest retailer of blurb chief power. As of 2010, a approach for chief appetite is softening in America, and some companies have cold their applications for licenses to build.[80][81] Ground has been damaged on dual new chief plants with a sum of 4 reactors. The customarily reactor now underneath construction in America, during Watts Bar, Tennessee, was begun in 1973 and might be finished in 2012. Of a 104 reactors now handling in a U.S., belligerent was damaged on all of them in 1974 or earlier.[80][81] In Sep 2010, Matthew Wald from a New York Times reported that “the chief rebirth is looking tiny and delayed during a moment”.[82]

In Aug 2011, John Rowe, conduct of Exelon, America’s largest chief utility, conspicuous that this was not a time to build new chief plants, not given of domestic antithesis or a hazard of cost overruns, yet given of a low cost of healthy gas. “Shale [gas]”, conspicuous he, “is good for a country, bad for new chief development”.[83]

Following a 2011 Japanese chief accidents, a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced it will launch a extensive reserve hearing of a 104 chief appetite reactors opposite a United States, during a ask of President Obama. The Obama administration “continues to support a enlargement of chief appetite in a United States, notwithstanding a predicament in Japan”.[84] Following a Japanese chief emergency, open support for building chief appetite plants in a U.S. forsaken to 43%, somewhat revoke than it was immediately after a Three Mile Island collision in 1979, according to a CBS News poll.[85]

In his 2012 state-of-the-union address, Barack Obama conspicuous that America needs “an all-out, all-of-the-above devise that develops any accessible source of American energy.” President Obama boasted about a Michigan breeze turbine factory, America’s healthy reserve of healthy gas and widespread oil exploration. He urged Congress to pass taxation incentives for appetite efficiency, purify energy, and an finish to oil-company subsidies, yet done no discuss of chief power.[83]

In 2013, 4 aging reactors in a USA were henceforth sealed before their licenses lapsed given of high upkeep and correct costs during a time when healthy gas prices have fallen: San Onofre 2 and 3 in California, Crystal River 3 in Florida, and Kewaunee in Wisconsin.[86][87] The state of Vermont is perplexing to tighten Vermont Yankee, in Vernon. New York State is seeking to tighten Indian Point in Buchanan, 30 miles from New York City.[87] Loss of chief generating ability is approaching to be equivalent by a 5 new chief reactors now underneath construction, with a due sum ability of some-more than 5,000 MW.[88]

Renewable energy[edit]

Renewable appetite in a United States accounted for 12.9 percent of a domestically constructed electricity in 2013.[89]Renewable appetite reached a vital miracle in a initial entertain of 2011, when it contributed 11.7 percent of sum U.S. appetite prolongation (2.245 quadrillion BTUs of energy), leading appetite prolongation from chief appetite (2.125 quadrillion BTUs).[90] 2011 was a initial year given 1997 that renewables exceeded chief in US sum appetite production.[91]

Hydroelectric appetite is now a largest writer of renewable appetite in a U.S. It constructed around 6.2% of a nation’s sum electricity in 2010 that was 60.2% of a sum renewable appetite in a U.S.[26] The United States is a fourth largest writer of hydroelectricity in a universe after China, Canada and Brazil. The Grand Coulee Dam is a 5th largest hydroelectric appetite hire in a world.

U.S. breeze appetite commissioned ability now exceeds 65,000MW.[92] For calendar year 2014, a electricity constructed from breeze appetite in a United States amounted to 181.79 terawatt-hours, or 4.44% of all generated electrical energy.[93]Texas is resolutely determined as a personality in breeze appetite development, followed by Iowa and California.[94]

Several vast solar thermal appetite stations have also been built. The largest of these solar thermal appetite stations is a SEGS organisation of plants in a Mojave Desert with a sum generating ability of 354 MW, creation a complement a largest solar plant of any kind in a world.[95] As of 2015, a largest photovoltaic (PV) appetite plant in North America is Solar Star, a 579 megawatt photovoltaic appetite hire nearby Rosamond, California.[96][97][98]The Geysers in Northern California is a largest formidable of geothermal appetite prolongation in a world.

With 2,957 MW of commissioned geothermal capacity, a United States stays a universe personality with 30% of a online ability total. As of early 2009, 120 new projects are underway.[99] When developed, these projects could potentially supply adult to 3,979 MW of power, assembly a needs of about 4 million homes. At this rate of development, geothermal prolongation in a United States could surpass 15,000 MW by 2025.[100]

The growth of renewable appetite and appetite potency outlines “a new epoch of appetite exploration” in a United States, according to President Barack Obama.[101] In a corner residence to a Congress on Feb 24, 2009, President Obama called for doubling renewable appetite within a subsequent 3 years.[102] In his 2012 State of a Union address, President Barack Obama restated his joining to renewable appetite and mentioned a long-standing Interior Department joining to assent 10,000 MW of renewable appetite projects on open land in 2012.[103]

President Barack Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 enclosed some-more than $70 billion in approach spending and taxation credits for purify appetite and compared travel programs. This policy-stimulus multiple represents a largest sovereign joining in U.S. story for renewable energy, modernized transportation, and appetite charge initiatives. As a outcome of these new initiatives, many some-more utilities are approaching to strengthen their purify appetite programs.[104] In Feb 2011, a U.S. Department of Energy launched a SunShot initiative, a collaborative inhabitant bid to cut a sum cost of photovoltaic solar appetite systems by 75% by 2020.[105] Reaching this idea would make unsubsidized solar appetite cost-competitive with other forms of electricity and get grid relation .[106]

Biofuels[edit]

In new years there has been an augmenting seductiveness in biofuels – bioethanol and biodiesel – subsequent from common farming staples or waste. Increased domestic prolongation of these fuels could revoke US outlay on unfamiliar oil and urge appetite certainty if methods of producing and transporting a fuels do not engage complicated inputs of hoary fuels, as stream cultivation does.

Most cars on a highway now in a U.S. can run on blends of adult to 10% ethanol, and engine car manufacturers already furnish vehicles designed to run on many aloft ethanol blends. Portland, Oregon, recently became a initial city in a United States to need all gasoline sole within city boundary to enclose during slightest 10% ethanol.[107]Ford, Daimler AG, and GM are among a car companies that sell “flexible-fuel” cars, trucks, and minivans that can use gasoline and ethanol blends pleat from pristine gasoline adult to 85% ethanol (E85). By mid-2006, there were approximately 6 million E85-compatible vehicles on U.S. roads.[108]

The Renewable Fuels Association depends 113 U.S. ethanol distilleries in operation and another 78 underneath construction, with ability to furnish 11.8 billion gallons within a subsequent few years. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) predicts in a Annual Energy Outlook 2007 that ethanol outlay will strech 11.2 billion US gallons (42,000,000 m3) by 2012, outstripping a 7.5 billion US gallons (28,000,000 m3) compulsory in a Renewable Fuel Standard that was enacted as partial of a Energy Policy Act of 2005.[109]

Expanding ethanol fuel (and biodiesel) industries yield jobs in plant construction, operations, and maintenance, mostly in farming communities. According to a Renewable Fuels Association, a ethanol attention sum roughly 154,000 U.S. jobs in 2005 alone, boosting domicile income by $5.7 billion. It also contributed about $3.5 billion in taxation revenues during a local, state, and sovereign levels.[108]

In new years, there has been critique about a prolongation of ethanol fuel from food crops.[110][111][112] However, second epoch biofuels are now being constructed from a many broader operation of feedstocks including a cellulose in dedicated appetite crops (perennial grasses such as switchgrass and Miscanthus giganteus), forestry materials, a co-products from food production, and domestic unfeeling waste.[113] Produced responsibly they are tolerable appetite sources that need not obstruct any land from flourishing food, nor repairs a environment.[114][115]

Energy efficiency[edit]

There are many opposite forms of appetite potency innovation, including fit H2O heaters; softened refrigerators and freezers; modernized building control technologies and advances in heating, ventilation, and cooling (HVAC); intelligent windows that adjust to say a gentle interior environment; new building codes to revoke unnecessary appetite use; and compress fluorescent lights. Improvements in buildings alone, where over sixty percent of all appetite is used, can save tens of billions of dollars per year.[117]

Several states, including California, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin, have consistently deployed appetite potency innovations. Their state formulation officials, citizens, and attention leaders, have found these really cost-effective, mostly providing larger use during revoke personal and amicable cost than simply adding some-more fossil-fuel formed supply. This is a box for several reasons. Energy fit technologies mostly paint upgrades in use by aloft opening (e.g. aloft peculiarity lighting, heating and cooling with larger controls, or softened trustworthiness of use by larger ability of utilities to respond to time of rise demand). So these innovations can yield a better, rebate costly service.[117]

A far-reaching operation of appetite fit technologies have subordinate advantages in softened peculiarity of life, such as modernized windows that not customarily save on heating and cooling expenses, yet also make a workplace or home some-more comfortable. Another instance is some-more fit vehicles, that not customarily save immediately on fuel purchases, yet also evacuate fewer pollutants, improving health and saving on medical costs to a particular and to society.[117]

In 1994, Amory Lovins grown a pattern judgment of a Hypercar. This car would have ultra-light construction with an aerodynamic physique regulating modernized combination materials, low-drag design, and hybrid drive.[118] Designers of a Hypercar explain it would grasp a three- to five-fold alleviation in fuel economy, equal or softened performance, safety, amenity, and affordability, compared with today’s cars.[119] Lovins says a commercialisation of a Hypercar began in 2014, with a prolongation of a all-carbon electric BMW i-3 family and a 313 miles per gallon Volkswagen XL1.[120]

Energy budget, initiatives and incentives[edit]

An inducement ensuing from US appetite process is a cause that provides ground for a specific march of movement per a use of energy. In a U.S. many appetite process incentives take a form of financial incentives. Examples of these embody taxation breaks, taxation reductions, taxation exemptions, rebates, loans and specific funding. Throughout US story there have been many incentives sum by U.S. appetite policy.

Most recently a Energy Policy Act of 2005, Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, and Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, any foster several appetite potency improvements and inspire growth of specific appetite sources. U.S. Energy process incentives can offer as a vital demeanour to rise certain industries that devise to revoke America’s coherence on unfamiliar petroleum products and emanate jobs and industries that boost a inhabitant economy. The ability to do this depends on that industries and products a supervision chooses to subsidize.

Budget[edit]

The 2012 bill that President Obama submitted to Congress calls for a 70 percent boost over a 2011 allocation for sovereign examine and growth activities compared to renewable energy. The Office of Science in a Department of Energy would accept $2.0 billion for simple appetite sciences to learn new ways to produce, store and use energy. Included in that volume are allocations of $457 million for solar energy; $341 million for biofuels and biomass RD, including a new retreat auction to foster modernized biofuels; and some-more than doubling investment in geothermal appetite to $102 million. The bill includes appropriation to accelerate a deployment of new models of appetite examine pioneered in a final several years, including $550 million for a Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy, a module that supports breakthrough ideas.[121]

Public investment[edit]

Public investment can capacitate a growth of infrastructure projects by a use of open funds, grants, loans or other financing options. These supports yield a means for allocating a collateral required for a growth of renewable appetite technologies.

Tax incentives[edit]

Federal taxation incentives can be designed to accelerate marketplace adoption, emanate jobs, inspire investment in a open good (reduced pollution) or inspire investment in renewable record examine and development. The Production Tax Credit (PTC) reduces a sovereign income taxes of competent tax-paying owners of renewable appetite projects formed on a electrical outlay (measured in kWh) of grid-connected renewable appetite facilities. The Investment Tax Credit (ITC) reduces sovereign income taxes for competent tax-paying owners formed on dollars of collateral investment in renewable appetite projects. The Advanced Energy Manufacturing Tax Credit (MTC) awards taxation credits to new, expanded, or re-equipped domestic prolongation comforts that support purify appetite development.[122]

Loan guarantees[edit]

The Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program, determined by a Energy Policy Act of 2005 and extended by a American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, attempts to pave a approach for financier support of purify appetite projects by providing a pledge of financing adult to 80% of a devise cost. The module is scheduled to finish on Sep 30, 2011, unless Congress passes serve legislation.[123]

Renewable portfolio standard[edit]

A Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) is a charge that requires electricity providers to supply to their business a smallest volume of appetite from renewable sources, customarily as a commission of sum appetite use. As of Jun 2010, such standards have been enacted in 31 U.S. states and a District of Columbia.[124] For example, Governor Jerry Brown sealed legislation requiring California’s utilities to get 33 percent of their electricity from renewable appetite sources by a finish of 2020.[125] Congress has deliberate a inhabitant RPS given 1997: a Senate has upheld legislation 3 times, and a House once.[126] As of Apr 2011, both houses have not acted in unanimity to pass legislation.

Biofuel subsidies[edit]

In a United States biofuel subsidies have been fit on a following grounds: appetite independence, rebate in hothouse gas emissions, improvements in farming growth compared to biofuel plants and plantation income support. Several economists from Iowa State University found “there is no justification to oppose that a primary design of biofuel process is to support plantation income.”[127]

Consumer subsidies[edit]

Consumers who squeeze hybrid vehicles are authorised for a taxation credit that depends on a form of car and a disproportion in fuel economy in comparison to vehicles of identical weights. These credits operation from several hundred dollars to a few thousand dollars.[128] Homeowners can accept a taxation credit adult to $500 for appetite fit products like insulation, windows, doors, as good as heating and cooling equipment. Homeowners who implement solar electric systems can accept a 30% taxation credit and homeowners who implement tiny breeze systems can accept a taxation credit adult to $4000. Geothermal feverishness pumps also validate for taxation credits adult to $2,000.[129]

Other subsidies[edit]

Recent appetite process incentives have provided, among other things, billions of dollars in taxation reductions for chief power, hoary fuel production, purify spark technologies,renewable electricity production, and charge and potency improvements.[130]

Electricity distribution[edit]

Long stretch electric appetite smoothness formula in appetite loss, by electrical resistance, feverishness generation, electromagnetic initiation and less-than-perfect electrical insulation.[131] In 1995, these waste were estimated during 7.2%.[132] Energy epoch and placement can be some-more fit a closer it is to a indicate of use, if conducted in a high-efficiency generator, such as a CHP. In a epoch and smoothness of electrical power, complement waste along a smoothness sequence are pronounced. Of 5 units of appetite going into many vast appetite plants, customarily about one section of appetite is delivered to a consumer in a serviceable form.[133]

A identical conditions exists in gas transport, where compressor stations along pipelines use appetite to keep a gas moving, or where gas liquefaction/cooling/regasification in a liquiefied healthy gas supply sequence uses a estimable volume of energy, even yet a scale of a detriment is not as conspicuous as it is in electricity.

Distributed epoch is a means of shortening sum and smoothness losses.

Statistics[edit]

Electricity[edit]

Electricity prolongation by source[134][edit]

Electricity outlay by sector[134][edit]

Oil[edit]

  • production: 9.688-million-barrels-per-day (1,540,300 m3/d) (2010 est.)
  • consumption: 19.15-million-barrels-per-day (3,045,000 m3/d) (2010 est.)[135]

Heat engines are customarily 20% fit during converting oil into work.[136][137] Electric smoothness (production to consumer) loses over 23% of a appetite due to generation, transmission, and distribution.[138]

Carbon dioxide emissions[edit]

The EPA has a management to umpire hothouse gas emissions, underneath a Clean Air Act, and is one of a agency’s 7 priorities.[139]

Public opinion[edit]

The U.S. formula from a 1st Annual World Environment Review, published on Jun 5, 2007 suggested that:[141]

  • 74% are endangered about meridian change.
  • 80% cruise their Government should do some-more to tackle tellurian warming.
  • 84% cruise that a US is too contingent on hoary fuels.
  • 72% cruise that a US is too reliant on unfamiliar oil.
  • 79% cruise that a US Government should do some-more to boost a series of hybrid cars that are sold.
  • 67% cruise that a US Government should concede some-more off seaside drilling.

The open is also utterly transparent on a priorities when it comes to compelling appetite charge contra augmenting a supply of oil, coal, and healthy gas. When asked that of these should be a aloft priority, a open chooses appetite charge by a really far-reaching 68 percent-to-21 percent margin.[142] The open also primarily believes that a need to cut down on appetite outlay and strengthen a sourroundings means augmenting appetite potency should be mandated for certain products. Ninety-two percent of Americans now support such requirements.[143]

However, when appetite process and meridian change are compared to other issues, they are rated intensely low in terms of importance. A Pew Research Center check on open priorities for 2011 found that tellurian warming ranked final of twenty-two probable process priorities. The same consult in 2012 found identical results.[144]

Gallup found that from 2009 by a latest check in Mar 2013, open opinion has been scarcely uniformly separate on either to give priority to a sourroundings or to building appetite sources such as oil, gas, and coal. This represents a change from check formula from 2001 by 2008, when transparent pluralities of Americans wanted environmental concerns to take priority over building hoary fuel resources. However, open opinion still heavily favors an significance on breeze and solar appetite (59 percent) over hoary fuels (31 percent).[145]

General legislative policy, legislation and plans[edit]

The stream conduct of a U.S. Department of Energy underneath a Obama administration is Dr. Ernest Moniz, who succeeded Dr. Steven Chu in May 2013.

As of Sep 2012, “The goal of a Energy Department is to safeguard America’s certainty and wealth by addressing a energy, environmental and chief hurdles by transformative scholarship and record solutions.”[146]

  • Catalyze a timely, material, and fit mutation of a nation’s appetite complement and secure U.S. care in purify appetite technologies.
  • Maintain a colourful U.S. bid in scholarship and engineering as a cornerstone of a mercantile wealth with transparent care in vital areas.
  • Enhance chief certainty by defense, nonproliferation, and environmental efforts.
  • Establish an operational and variable horizon that combines a best knowledge of all Department stakeholders to maximize goal success.

In Dec 2009, a United States Patent and Trademark Office announced a Green Patent Pilot Program.[147] The module was instituted to accelerate a hearing of obvious applications relating to certain immature technologies, including a appetite sector.[148] The commander module was primarily designed to accommodate 3,000 applications compared to certain immature record categories, and a module was creatively set to end on Dec 8, 2010. In May, 2010, a USPTO announced that it would enhance a commander program.[149]

Greenhouse gas emissions[edit]

Although exceeded by China given 2007,[150] a United States has historically been a world’s largest writer of hothouse gases.[151] Some states are many some-more inclusive polluters than others. The state of Texas produces approximately 1.5 trillion pounds of CO dioxide yearly, some-more than any republic in a universe solely 5 outward of a United States: China, Russia, Japan, India, and Germany.[152]

Despite signing a Kyoto Protocol, a United States has conjunction validated nor cold from it. In a deficiency of resolution it stays non-binding on a US.

The Obama Administration has betrothed to take specific movement towards slackening of meridian change. In addition, during state and inner levels, there are now a series of initiatives. As of Mar 11, 2007, mayors of 418 US cities in 50 states have permitted a Kyoto protocol, after Mayor Greg Nickels of Seattle started a inhabitant bid to get cities to determine to a protocol.[153] As of Jan 18, 2007, 8 Northeastern US states are concerned in a Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI),[154] a state turn emissions capping and trade program.

On Aug 31, 2006, a California Legislature reached an agreement with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to revoke a state’s greenhouse-gas emissions, that arrange during 12th-largest CO emitter in a world,[155] by 25 percent by a year 2020. This resulted in a Global Warming Solutions Act that effectively puts California in line with a Kyoto limitations, yet during a date after than a 2008–2012 Kyoto joining period.

In a non-binding ‘Washington Declaration’ resolved on Feb 16, 2007, a United States, together with Presidents or Prime Ministers from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa resolved in element on a outline of a inheritor to a Kyoto Protocol. They visualize a tellurian cap-and-trade complement that would request to both industrialized nations and building countries, and hoped that this would be in place by 2009.[156][157]

Chemistry Professor Nathan Lewis during Caltech estimates that to keep windy CO levels subsequent 750 ppm, a turn during that critical meridian change would occur, by a year 2050, a United States would need to beget twice as many appetite from renewable sources as is generated by all appetite sources sum today.[158] However, stream examine indicates that even CO dioxide concentrations in additional of 450 ppm would outcome in irrevocable tellurian meridian change.[159]

The book, Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free, A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy,[160] by Arjun Makhijani, argues that in sequence to accommodate goals of tying tellurian warming to 2 °C, a universe will need to revoke CO2 emissions by 85% and a U.S. will need to revoke emissions by 95%, that can be extended to within a few percent and or rebate of CO giveaway with small additional change.[161] The book calls for phasing out use of oil, healthy gas, and spark that does not use CO confiscation by a year 2050.[162] Effective delivered appetite is projected to boost from about 75 Quadrillion Btu in 2005 to about 125 Quadrillion in 2050,[163] yet due to potency increases, a tangible appetite submit is projected to boost from about 99 Quadrillion Btu in 2005 to about 103 Quadrillion in 2010 and afterwards to diminution to about 77 Quadrillion in 2050.[164] Petroleum use is projected to boost until 2010 and afterwards linearly diminution to 0 by 2050. The roadmap calls for chief appetite to diminution to 0 during a same time, with a rebate also commencement in 2010.[165]

In his book Hell and High Water, author Joseph Romm calls for a fast deployment of existent technologies to diminution CO emissions. In a follow-up essay in Nature.com in Jun 2008, he argues that “If we are to have certainty in a ability to stabilise CO dioxide levels subsequent 450 p.p.m. emissions contingency normal rebate than [5 billion metric tons of carbon] per year over a century. This means accelerating a deployment of a 11 wedges so they start to take outcome in 2015 and are totally operational in many rebate time than creatively modelled by Socolow and Pacala.”[166]

In 2012, a National Renewable Energy Laboratory assessed a technical intensity for renewable electricity for any of a 50 states, and resolved that any state has technical intensity for renewable electricity, mostly from solar appetite and breeze power, larger than a stream electricity consumption. The news cautions: “Note that as a technical potential, rather than mercantile or marketplace potential, these estimates do not cruise accessibility of smoothness infrastructure, costs, trustworthiness or time-of-dispatch, stream or destiny electricity loads, or applicable policies.”[167]

See also[edit]

Politics portal

Energy portal

United States portal

References[edit]

  1. ^ Jimmy Carter. “Crisis of Confidence Speech 1979”. Cartercenter.org. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  2. ^ “CRS Report for Congress”. Digital.library.unt.edu. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  3. ^ a b “Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)”. Retrieved 2008-01-18. 
  4. ^ Grossman, Peter (2013). U.S. Energy Policy and a Pursuit of Failure. Cambridge University Press. p. 416. ISBN 978-1107005174. 
  5. ^ Hamilton, Michael S. 2013. Energy Policy Analysis: A Conceptual Framework. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
  6. ^ “Database of State Incentives for Renewables Efficiency”. Dsireusa.org. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  7. ^ Daly, Herman E. (2006). “Sustainable Development – Definitions, Principles, Policies”. In Keiner, Marco. The Future of Sustainability. Springer. p. 257. ISBN 978-1-4020-4734-3. 
  8. ^ Smith, Grant (4 Jul 2014). “U.S. is now world’s biggest oil producer”. www.chicagotribune.com (Bloomberg News). Retrieved 4 July 2014. 
  9. ^ a b c “Energy in a United States: 1635–2000 – Electricity”. United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  10. ^ http://lsa.colorado.edu/summarystreet/texts/naturalgas.htm
  11. ^ [1] Archived Feb 9, 2008, during a Wayback Machine.
  12. ^ Vivian, John. “Wood and Coal Stove Advisory”. Motherearthnews.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  13. ^ Painter, David S. (1986). Oil and a American Century: The Political Economy of US Foreign Oil Policy, 1941–1954. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-801-82693-1. 
  14. ^ “Petroleum Timeline”. United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  15. ^ “Energy in a United States: 1635–2000 – Coal”. United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  16. ^ a b “Energy in a United States: 1635–2000 – Total Energy”. United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  17. ^ “Energy in a United States: 1635–2000 – Petroleum”. United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  18. ^ “Niagara Falls History of Power”. Niagarafrontier.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  19. ^ “Energy in a United States: 1635–2000 – Renewable”. United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  20. ^ “Energy – It Just Doesn’t Add Up | Renewable Energy News Article”. Renewableenergyworld.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  21. ^ Estimating U.S. Government Subsidies to Energy Sources: 2002–2008, Environmental Law Institute
  22. ^ Erwin, Jerry (2006-10-09). “The Challenges Facing a Intelligence Community Regarding Global Oil Depletion”. Portland Peak Oil. Retrieved 2009-04-29. [dead link]
  23. ^ “Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change, and Energy”. United States Department of Energy. 2004-04-02. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  24. ^ “ENERGY INFOCARD – United States”. United States Department of Energy. Oct 2006. Retrieved 2007-07-04. [dead link]
  25. ^ “SEI: Energy Consumption”. Solarenergy.org. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  26. ^ a b “EIA – Petroleum Basic Data”. Eia.doe.gov. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  27. ^ See Energy Information Administration, “Canada” (2009 report)
  28. ^ How contingent are we on unfamiliar oil? 10 May 2013.
  29. ^ Jeffrey P. Bialos, “Oil imports and natiional security”, Univ. of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law, 1989, v.11 n.2 p.235-300.
  30. ^ “25th Anniversary of a 1973 Oil Embargo”. United States Department of Energy. 1998-03-09. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  31. ^ “Performance Profiles of Major Energy Producers 1993” (PDF). United States Department of Energy. Retrieved 2007-07-04. See page 48. 
  32. ^ a b “Petroleum Chronology of events 1970–2000”. United States Department of Energy. May 2002. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  33. ^ a b Higher gasoline cost seen pleat down Americans, Reuters, 11 Sep 07 accessed 2 Oct 2007
  34. ^ Carpool Archived Jan 17, 2008, during a Wayback Machine.
  35. ^ 8th Annual Emerging Transportation Plenary Archived Feb 16, 2008, during a Wayback Machine.
  36. ^ After a Oil Runs Out, washingtonpost.com
  37. ^ Kathleen Kingsbury (2007-11-16). “After a Oil Crisis, a Food Crisis?”. Time Magazine. Retrieved 2008-04-28. 
  38. ^ “Global warming fury lets tellurian craving grow”. London: Telegraph. 2011-05-31. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  39. ^ Baltimore, Chris. “New U.S. Congress looks to boost swap fuels,” The Boston Globe, Jan 5, 2007. Retrieved on Aug 23, 2007 Archived Jun 17, 2008, during a Wayback Machine.
  40. ^ “Hydrogen Economy Fact Sheet”. The White House. 2003-06-25. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  41. ^ Robert S. Boyd, McClatchy Newspapers. “Hydrogen cars might be a prolonged time coming”. Mcclatchydc.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  42. ^ Bloomberg, National poll, 11 Dec. 2013.
  43. ^ US EIA, Natural gas year-in-review 2008, 2009.
  44. ^ US EIA, International Energy Statistics, accessed 10 Aug. 2014.
  45. ^ US EIA, Coal overview
  46. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Imports and exports of electricity, and Electricity: outline statistics for a United States, accessed 21 Dec. 2013.
  47. ^ US EIA, Uranium and chief fuel statistics Energy Annual 2011
  48. ^ US EIA, Energy daily, 11 Jul 2011.
  49. ^ “Architects and Climate Change” (PDF). Aia.org. 2011-12-13. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  50. ^ “Electricity Rates and Usage in a United States”. Electricity Local. Retrieved 2014-05-12. 
  51. ^ “Weatherization Assistance Program”. Eere.energy.gov. 2012-01-30. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  52. ^ “Communities of a Future” (PDF). Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  53. ^ “2009 Toyota Prius: Spy Report”. Popularmechanics.com. 2007-02-07. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  54. ^ Stahl, Andreas. “Ultra-Green: Radical 100-MPG Toyota Prius in a Works for 2009”. Edmunds.com. Archived from the original on Aug 6, 2009. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  55. ^ US Dept. of Energy, U.S. Primary Energy Consumption by Source and Sector, 2012
  56. ^ Amory Lovins (March–April 2012). “A Farewell to Fossil Fuels”. Foreign Affairs. 
  57. ^ a b “Basic Petroleum Statistics”. Energy Information Administration. Jun 2006. Retrieved 2007-07-04. 
  58. ^ “Domestic Demand for Refined Petroleum Products by Sector”. U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Retrieved 2007-12-20. 
  59. ^ “CIA – The World Factbook – European Union”. Cia.gov. Retrieved 2009-04-26. 
  60. ^ “CIA – The World Factbook – United States”. Cia.gov. Retrieved 2009-04-26. 
  61. ^ The Road to Recovery Begins in Detroit[dead link] accessed 2 Oct 2007 Archived Sep 30, 2007, during a Wayback Machine.[dead link]
  62. ^ Advanced Technology Vehicles: The Road Ahead accessed 2 Oct 2007 Archived Sep 26, 2007, during a Wayback Machine.
  63. ^ “Gasoline Tops $5 A Gallon In Gorda”. Theksbwchannel.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  64. ^ “Fuel Prices Increase Nationwide as California Braces for $4/Gallon Gas in ’08”. Awmanet.org. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  65. ^ Tertzakian, Peter (2005-11-15). “The U.S. Senate’s Oil Spill”. Forbes.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  66. ^ “How Dependent Is a United States on Foreign Oil? – eia.doe.gov”. Tonto.eia.doe.gov. 2008-08-22. Retrieved 2009-04-26. 
  67. ^ Bonskowski, Richard F. (2001-03-27). “Energy Information Administration Statistics and Projections for U.S. Coal Supply and Demand: U.S. Coal, Domestic and International Issues” (PDF). US Department of Energy. Retrieved 2007-07-07. 
  68. ^ Benson, Sally M. “Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Deep Geologic Formations” (PDF). Pew Center on Global Climate Change and a National Commission on Energy Policy. Retrieved 2007-07-07. 
  69. ^ “Coal – A Fossil Fuel”. US Department of Energy. Feb 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-22. 
  70. ^ Table 7.1 Coal Overview, Selected Years, 1949–2006, p. 203. Annual Energy Review 2006 United States Energy Information Administration, United States Department of Energy. (Caution: PDF is 10 megabytes) See: Table of Contents
  71. ^ “U.S. race hits 300 million mark”. MSNBC. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  72. ^ “U.S. Per Capita Use of Energy”. Eia.doe.gov. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  73. ^ Table 7.3 Coal Consumption by Sector, Selected Years, 1949–2006 (p. 207) and Figure 7.3 Coal Consumption by Sector (p. 206) Annual Energy Review 2006 United States Energy Information Administration, United States Department of Energy. (Caution: PDF is 10 megabytes) See: Table of Contents
  74. ^ Energy in a United States: 1635–2000 United States Energy Information Administration, United States Department of Energy.
  75. ^ “Human-Related Sources and Sinks of Carbon Dioxide”. Epa.gov. 2006-06-28. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  76. ^ Rachel Barron (2007-10-15). “New Policy Could Put CO2 Underground”. Greentechmedia.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  77. ^ The good spark hole Archived May 25, 2008, during a Wayback Machine.
  78. ^ a b Energy Information Administration. “Natural Gas Explained : Where Our Natural Gas Comes From”. Retrieved 2009-12-17. 
  79. ^ Mouawad, Jad (17 Jun 2009). “Estimate places healthy gas pot 35% higher”. The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-10-25. 
  80. ^ a b Matthew L. Wald (December 7, 2010). “Nuclear ‘Renaissance’ Is Short on Largess”. The New York Times. 
  81. ^ a b “Team France in disarray: Unhappy attempts to revitalise a inhabitant industry”. The Economist. Dec 2, 2010. 
  82. ^ Matthew L. Wald. (September 23, 2010). “Aid Sought for Nuclear Plants”. Green (The New York Times). 
  83. ^ a b “America’s chief attention struggles to get off a floor”. The Economist. Feb 18, 2012. 
  84. ^ JulieAnn McKellogg (March 18, 2011). “US Nuclear Renaissance Further Crippled by Japan Crisis”. Voice of America. 
  85. ^ Michael Cooper (March 22, 2011). “Nuclear Power Loses Support in New Poll”. The New York Times. 
  86. ^ Mark Cooper (18 Jun 2013). “Nuclear aging: Not so graceful”. Bulletin of a Atomic Scientists. 
  87. ^ a b Matthew Wald (June 14, 2013). “Nuclear Plants, Old and Uncompetitive, Are Closing Earlier Than Expected”. New York Times. 
  88. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Lower appetite prices and high correct costs expostulate chief retirements 2 Jul 2013.
  89. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, Jan 2013.
  90. ^ Ron Pernick and Clint Wilder (2012). “Clean Tech Nation” (PDF). p. 5. 
  91. ^ US Energy Information Administration, Total Energy.
  92. ^ “AWEA 4th entertain 2014 Public Market Report” (PDF). American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). Jan 2014. Retrieved February 1, 2014. 
  93. ^ “Electric Power Monthly” (PDF). Report. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. 4 Mar 2015. 
  94. ^ American Wind Energy Association, Annual U.S. breeze appetite rankings lane industry’s fast growth
  95. ^ SEGS I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII IX
  96. ^ “Solar Star, Largest PV Power Plant in a World, Now Operational”. GreenTechMedia.com. 24 Jun 2015. 
  97. ^ “The Solar Star Projects”. 
  98. ^ “Solar Star we and II”. 
  99. ^ REN21 (2009). Renewables Global Status Report: 2009 Update p. 12.
  100. ^ “Update: The State of U.S. Geothermal Production and Development”. Renewableenergyworld.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  101. ^ President Obama Touts Clean Energy on Earth Day
  102. ^ Remarks of President Barack Obama — Address to Joint Session of Congress
  103. ^ Lindsay Morris (25 Jan 2012). “Obama: Sticking to “Promise of Clean Energy. Renewable Energy World. 
  104. ^ Clean Edge (2009). Clean Energy Trends 2009 pp. 1-4.
  105. ^ DOE’s SunShot Program Aims to Reach Competitive Solar By 2020. Fast Company, Feb. 4, 2011.
  106. ^ “SunShot Initiative About page, Accessed Jan. 20, 2012”. .eere.energy.gov. 2011-11-16. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  107. ^ Introduction: The Clean Tech Opportunity p. 3. Archived Jul 16, 2007, during a Wayback Machine.
  108. ^ a b Worldwatch Institute and Center for American Progress (2006). American energy: The renewable trail to appetite security
  109. ^ “Industrial Biotechnology Is Revolutionizing a Production of Ethanol Transportation Fuel” (PDF). Bio.org. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  110. ^ “Crime Against Humanity”. 
  111. ^ “Financial Times: OECD Warns Against Biofuels Subsidies”. 
  112. ^ “Global Science Forum Conference on Scientific Challenges for Energy Research: Energy At The Crossroads” (PDF). 
  113. ^ “Hydrogen injection could boost biofuel production”. Environment.newscientist.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  114. ^ Oxburgh, Ron. Fuelling wish for a future, Courier Mail, 15 Aug 2007.
  115. ^ Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges p. 2.
  116. ^ “Philips Tornado Asian Compact Fluorescent”. Philips. Retrieved 2007-12-24. 
  117. ^ a b c “Opportunities for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions” (PDF). Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  118. ^ Hypercars, hydrogen, and a automotive transition International Journal of Vehicle Design, Vol. 35, Nos. 1/2, 2004.
  119. ^ Diesendorf, Mark (2007). Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy, UNSW Press, pp. 191–192.
  120. ^ John Vidal (18 Feb 2014). “Amory Lovins: appetite idealist sees renewables series in full swing”. The Guardian. 
  121. ^ Budget of a United States Government, Fiscal Year 2012, Department of Energy U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 2011. Retrieved 2011-04-12.
  122. ^ The Bottom Line on Renewable Energy Tax Credits. World Resources Institute
  123. ^ U.S. Renewable Energy Quarterly Report, Oct 2010 American Council On Renewable Energy
  124. ^ U.S. Renewable Energy Quarterly Report American Council on Renewable Energy, Oct 2010. Retrieved 2011-04-12.
  125. ^ David R. Baker (April 12, 2011). “Brown signs law requiring 33% renewable energy”. San Francisco Chronicle. 
  126. ^ Comparative Analysis of Three Proposed Federal Renewable Electricity Standards National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-6A2-45877, May 2009.
  127. ^ Rubin, Ofir D. et al. 2008. Implied Objectives of U.S. Biofuel Subsidies. Iowa State University.
  128. ^ “Summary of a Credit for Qualified Hybrid Vehicles”. Irs.gov. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  129. ^ “Consumer Energy Tax Incentives”. Energy.gov. 2011-06-30. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  130. ^ Energy Policy Act of 2005
  131. ^ “Transmission and placement technologies” (PDF). Retrieved 2008-01-18. 
  132. ^ “Technology Options for a Near and Long Term” (PDF). U.S. Climate Change Technology Program. Aug 2005. Retrieved 2008-10-05. 
  133. ^ “Electric System Losses to Inefficiency” (PDF). Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  134. ^ a b “Total Energy – Data – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)”. Eia.doe.gov. Retrieved 2013-04-14. 
  135. ^ “CIA – The World Factbook”. CIA.gov. Retrieved 2012-09-01. 
  136. ^ “Improving IC Engine Efficiency”. Courses.washington.edu. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  137. ^ “Carnot Cycle”. Hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  138. ^ Preston, John L. (October 1994). “Comparability of Supply- and Consumption-Derived Estimates of Manufacturing Energy Consumption” (PDF). US Department of Energy. Table 7: Total energy: 29,568.0 trillion Btu, Loss: 7,014.1 trillion Btu 
  139. ^ Seven Priorities for EPA’s Future
  140. ^ “U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report”. U.S. EPA. Apr 2012. Retrieved 2012-09-01. 
  141. ^ First Annual World Environment Review Poll Reveals Countries Want Governments to Take Strong Action on Climate Change, Global Market Insite, published 2007-06-05, accessed 2007-05-09 Archived Oct 22, 2013, during a Wayback Machine.
  142. ^ Teixeira, Ruy (2007-06-14). “Public Opinion Snapshot: Public Wants Action on Energy and a Environment”. Center for American Progress. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  143. ^ Public Opinion Snapshot: Public Wants Action on Energy and a Environment, Center for American Progress, published 2007-06-15,
  144. ^ “Public Priorities: Deficit Rising, Terrorism Slipping.” Pew Research Center for a People and a Press RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Jan. 2013.
  145. ^ Jeffrey M. Jones, Americans Still Divided on Energy-Environment Trade-Off, Gallup.
  146. ^ “Mission”. Whitehouse.gov. 2012-09-01. Retrieved 2012-09-01. 
  147. ^ “USPTO Expands Green Technology Pilot Program to More Inventions”. United States Patent and Trademark Office. 2010-05-21. Retrieved 2012-07-12. 
  148. ^ “Emerging Energy and Intellectual Property – The Often Unappreciated Risks and Hurdles of Government Regulations and Standard Setting Organizations”. The National Law Review. Husch Blackwell. 2012-05-22. Retrieved 2012-07-10. 
  149. ^ “USPTO Extends Deadline to Participate in Green Technology Pilot Program by One Year”. United States Patent and Trademark Office. 2010-11-10. Retrieved 2012-07-12. 
  150. ^ “China now no. 1 in CO2 emissions; USA in second position”. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Archived from the original on Jul 1, 2007. 
  151. ^ Raupach, M.R. et al. (2007) “Global and informal drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 104(24): 10288–93.
  152. ^ Borenstein, Seth (June 4, 2007). “Blame coal: Texas leads in altogether emissions”. USA Today. Retrieved February 18, 2015. 
  153. ^ “US Climate Protection Agreement Home Page”. Archived from the original on 2006-09-30. Retrieved 2006-11-07. 
  154. ^ “Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative”. Retrieved 2006-11-07. 
  155. ^ Wintour, Patrick (2006-08-01). “Blair signs meridian agreement with Schwarzenegger”. London: The Guardian. Retrieved 2007-07-07. 
  156. ^ “Politicians pointer new meridian pact”. BBC News. 2007-02-16. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  157. ^ “Guardian Unlimited: Global leaders strech meridian change agreement”. London: Environment.guardian.co.uk. 2007-02-16. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  158. ^ Energy Notes
  159. ^ Post a Comment. “U.S. Stabilization Wedges: Scientific American”. Sciam.com. Retrieved 2012-03-30. 
  160. ^ Makhijani, Arjun Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free, A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy 2007 ISBN 978-1-57143-173-8
  161. ^ Makhijani pg. 3
  162. ^ Makhijani Fig. 5-5, 5-8
  163. ^ Makhijani Fig. 5-7
  164. ^ Makhijani Fig. 5-8
  165. ^ Makhijani Fig. 5-5
  166. ^ Romm, Joseph. “Cleaning adult on carbon”, Jun 19, 2008
  167. ^ “Renewable Energy Technical Potential”. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved 2012-09-01. , p.2.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

Article source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_policy_of_the_United_States

پاسخ دهید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *

*

code